14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

870<br />

29/09/09<br />

No addressee(s); no sanction for non-compliance; unclear how this is being<br />

measured (and measurement may be quite different to ‘estimation’ in this<br />

respect).<br />

National Biodegradable <strong>Waste</strong> Strategy<br />

� Reductions in biodegradable waste (relative to trend in arisings), <strong>of</strong> 3% each<br />

year (2005 to 2007), 4% each year (2008 to 2010), 5% each year (2011 to<br />

2013), and 6% each year (2014 to 2016);<br />

No addressee(s); no sanctions; unclear whether this is achievable;<br />

� Targets for home composting at 20% <strong>of</strong> urban households and 55% <strong>of</strong> rural<br />

households – equivalent to some 35% <strong>of</strong> all households - by 2010;<br />

No addressee(s); no sanctions; unclear how this would be measured (and what<br />

the current level is);<br />

� Capture rate for paper and cardboard:<br />

• 45% for households and 61% for commerce in 2010, corresponding to<br />

55% <strong>of</strong> overall paper / cardboard generation within BMW;<br />

• 55% for households and 71% for commerce in 2013, corresponding to<br />

65% <strong>of</strong> overall paper / cardboard generation within BMW; and<br />

• 60% for households and 73% for commerce in 2016, corresponding to<br />

67% <strong>of</strong> overall paper / cardboard generation within BMW.<br />

No addressee(s); no sanctions for non-compliance; policy drivers unclear;<br />

� For organic waste, the targets were:<br />

• 40% coverage for households and 60% coverage for commerce in<br />

2010 at an estimated average yield <strong>of</strong> 45% to 60% respectively,<br />

corresponding to 25% <strong>of</strong> overall organic waste generation within BMW;<br />

• 45% coverage for households and 70% coverage for commerce in<br />

2013 at an estimated average yield <strong>of</strong> 50% to 65% respectively,<br />

corresponding to 33% <strong>of</strong> overall organic waste generation within BMW;<br />

and<br />

• 50% coverage for households and 70% coverage for commerce in<br />

2016 at an estimated average yield <strong>of</strong> 55% to 70% respectively,<br />

corresponding to 36% <strong>of</strong> overall organic waste generation within BMW.<br />

No addressee(s); no sanctions for non-compliance; policy drivers only now<br />

being shaped;<br />

In addition, there are now targets which Ireland has to meet under the producer<br />

responsibility Directives. These targets are set at the lowest rates permissible under<br />

EU legislation. Generally, producers are required to demonstrate that they are<br />

meeting the required targets, though not all addressees face such targets (notably<br />

the ‘producers’ who are not classified as major ones for the purpose <strong>of</strong> the producer<br />

responsibility scheme for packaging).<br />

A clear and persistent theme in the setting <strong>of</strong> targets in Ireland is that, with some<br />

exceptions, there are no clear addressees, and that where there are no addressees,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!