14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

plant is still relatively limited. 1273 The air quality limits imposed upon AD facilities are<br />

typically less onerous than those for waste incinerators; thus there is a lack <strong>of</strong><br />

incentive to incur the further expense that the installation <strong>of</strong> this additional<br />

equipment requires.<br />

Table 63-31 outlines the emissions from the combustion <strong>of</strong> biogas using a gas<br />

engine. The table uses data from the previously cited Reference Document along with<br />

information supplied through emissions tests at an Australian MBT plant operated by<br />

Global Renewables Ltd (GRL). The latter may overstate emissions, being derived from<br />

mixed waste sources.<br />

Table 63-31: Emissions from the Combustion <strong>of</strong> Biogas<br />

1028<br />

29/09/09<br />

Emissions Emissions from from from biogas biogas combusti combustion combusti on (g / tonne<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> waste waste to to process)<br />

process)<br />

CO 200<br />

Dust 20<br />

NOx 250<br />

Hydrocarbons 40<br />

SO2 20<br />

Notes<br />

Emissions are calculated assuming 3,960 m 3 exhaust gas is produced per hour from each <strong>of</strong><br />

two gas engines, using data provided by GRL from their Eastern Creek MBT facility in Australia<br />

(that facility treats 70,000 tonnes <strong>of</strong> waste per year in the AD part <strong>of</strong> the plant).<br />

Sources: European Commission (2006) Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control: Reference<br />

Document on Best Available Techniques for the <strong>Waste</strong> Treatment Industries, August 2006; EML Air<br />

PTY (2008) Test Report Prepared for Eastern Creek Operations, report for Global Renewables Ltd, April<br />

2008; AEA (2007) Mechanical Biological Treatment: Case Study 2: Eastern Creek UR 3R Sydney,<br />

Report to IEA Bioenergy Task 36, April 2007<br />

However, as was previously indicated in Table 63-29 the plant is assumed to<br />

generate 286 kWh <strong>of</strong> electricity per tonne <strong>of</strong> waste to the facility, and emissions to air<br />

are assumed to be <strong>of</strong>fset as a result <strong>of</strong> this energy production. The avoided air<br />

emissions resulting from electricity generation are presented in Table 63-32,<br />

calculated using emissions data supplied by Ecoinvent for European CCGT plant. The<br />

data suggests that there is a marginal air quality benefit associated with generating<br />

electricity using AD in comparison to generation at larger scale CCGT plant. As gas<br />

turbine efficiencies increase, the resultant higher firing temperatures lead to greater<br />

NOx formation. Thus measures taken to reduce NOx formation will be less effective at<br />

the larger and more efficient CCGT plant. 1274 Levels <strong>of</strong> other emissions will depend on<br />

1273 It is understood, however, that authorities in The Netherlands wanted to impose this as standard<br />

for all AD facilities.<br />

1274 European Commission (2006) Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control: Reference Document<br />

on Best Available Techniques for Large Combustion Plants, July 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!