14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

13<br />

waste from these sources. Member States can add more material waste<br />

streams from household or similar wastes to this target (e.g. biowaste) in<br />

which case the 50% target would apply to the totality <strong>of</strong> all waste streams<br />

included. I would also like to draw your attention to Article 11(3) <strong>of</strong> the draft<br />

revised <strong>Waste</strong> Framework Directive which specifies that any eventual<br />

modalities related to the application and calculation methods for verifying<br />

compliance with the targets need to be elaborated by the Commission and the<br />

Member States in comitology.<br />

The most recent EPA report suggests that recycling rates for the four materials under<br />

consideration paper, metal, plastic, glass, was such that the target would be met for<br />

each <strong>of</strong> metals, paper and glass, but not plastic (see Table 1-1). The target would be<br />

met if one aggregated the figures for all 4 materials.<br />

The picture is quite different if one looks only at household waste (see Table 1-2).<br />

Here, the 50% target is not met for the materials in combination. The target is just<br />

exceeded for paper, it is easily exceeded for glass, but in respect <strong>of</strong> plastics and<br />

metals, the performance is below what is suggested.<br />

Pending the agreement <strong>of</strong> rules described in para 3 above, Ireland would appear to<br />

be already meeting targets for municipal waste, though the hierarchy and Article 10<br />

should still be followed, subject to life-cycle thinking suggesting otherwise. Hence, the<br />

target under the <strong>Waste</strong> Framework Directive should be considered a bare minimum,<br />

and in any case, it may yet be supplemented by a requirement to separate biowaste<br />

at source.<br />

Table 1-1: Recycling Performance for 4 Key WFD Materials, Municipal <strong>Waste</strong><br />

Managed Managed<br />

Managed Landfilled Landfilled<br />

Landfilled Recycled<br />

Recycled Recycled<br />

Recycled<br />

(tonnes)<br />

(tonnes) (tonnes)<br />

(tonnes) (tonnes)<br />

(tonnes) (%)<br />

(%)<br />

Metals 133,500 50,000 83,499 62.5%<br />

Paper 914,069 384,245 529,824 58.0%<br />

Plastic 288,760 223,755 65,005 22.5%<br />

Glass 182,554 48,075 134,479 73.7%<br />

Total 1,518,883 706,075 812,807 53.5%<br />

Source: EPA (2009) National <strong>Waste</strong> Report 2007, Wexford: EPA.<br />

Table 1-2: Recycling Performance for 4 Key WFD Materials, Household <strong>Waste</strong><br />

Managed Managed<br />

Managed Landfilled<br />

Landfilled Recycled<br />

Recycled Recycled<br />

Recycled<br />

(tonnes)<br />

(tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes)<br />

(tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes)<br />

(tonnes) (%)<br />

(%)<br />

Metals 48,021 35,577 12,444 25.9%<br />

Paper 385,074 187,350 197,724 51.3%<br />

Plastic 195,881 153,662 42,219 21.6%<br />

Glass 131,300 38,759 92,540 70.5%<br />

Total 760,276 415,348 344,927 45.4%<br />

Source: EPA (2009) National <strong>Waste</strong> Report 2007, Wexford: EPA.<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!