14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62.0 Life-cycle Assessment <strong>of</strong> Residual <strong>Waste</strong><br />

Treatment Technologies<br />

This section carries out a life cycle assessment <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> residual waste treatment<br />

technologies, using the Environment Agency’s tool WRATE. The assessment is<br />

described in Section 62.1. Limitations <strong>of</strong> the LCA approach in general (as exemplified<br />

by the WRATE analysis) are described in Section 62.2.<br />

62.1 Life-cycle Assessment Using WRATE<br />

A recently published report produced by Fehily Timoney & Company (FTC), Veolia and<br />

Ramboll sought to investigate the role that the Mechanical Biological Treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

waste might play within the Irish waste management sector. 1188 Their report included<br />

an environmental impact appraisal which used the life-cycle tool WRATE to assess<br />

these impacts. Their appraisal indicated that the thermal treatment scenario which<br />

included the recovery <strong>of</strong> both heat and electricity performed the best against the six<br />

assessment criteria considered within WRATE’s default assessment method.<br />

However, their analysis also briefly considered results obtained using the full range <strong>of</strong><br />

MBT processes included within the s<strong>of</strong>tware. The latter assessment concluded that<br />

there was considerable relative variability between the different MBT systems.<br />

The approach taken within the current appraisal is to examine in more detail the<br />

variation seen in the results <strong>of</strong> the impact assessments indicated by WRATE for a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> MBT and incineration options. In addition, Eunomia holds an Expert License<br />

for the s<strong>of</strong>tware, which provides additional functionality with regard to analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

impacts at each <strong>of</strong> the process stages. This enables the identification <strong>of</strong> specific<br />

pollutants or chemicals causing the impact at each stage <strong>of</strong> the treatment process,<br />

within each <strong>of</strong> the impact assessments.<br />

Our modelling uses the default impact assessment methods included within the<br />

model. We have made the following core assumptions across all treatments<br />

considered within the appraisal:<br />

964<br />

� We have used the residual waste composition data recently produced by RPS<br />

for the EPA; 1189<br />

� The baseline fuel mix is based on the 2007 mix for Ireland; we have separately<br />

defined the marginal electricity source as a modern combined-cycle gas<br />

turbine (CCGT, reflecting the carbon intensity <strong>of</strong> the new build <strong>of</strong> electricity<br />

generation sources). Whilst the former is used when calculating impacts<br />

1188 Fehily Timoney & Company / Veolia Environmental Services / Ramboll (2008) Critical Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the Potential for Mechanical Biological Treatment for Irish <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong>: Volume 2, Research<br />

Report, Report for the Environmental Protection Agency, September 2008.<br />

1189 RPS (2009) Municipal <strong>Waste</strong> Characterisation Surveys 2008, Report for the EPA, March 2009.<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!