14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8.3 Key Organisations Involved in Implementation and<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

The usual approach is for national government to write into law the framework within<br />

which local government and waste collectors can operate. In most situations, the<br />

local authority, or a contractor to the local authority, provides the collection service to<br />

householders.<br />

The service is funded typically through a combination <strong>of</strong>:<br />

123<br />

• Central government taxation;<br />

• Taxes raised at the local level; and<br />

• The revenue from the variable charge element.<br />

As such, the actors involved usually include local, and sometimes, central<br />

government, as well as local government and the service operator, where this is not<br />

the municipality itself.<br />

Concerns generally arise with regard to the issue <strong>of</strong> fly-tipping. As a result, local<br />

authorities and other competent authorities also have some involvement in the<br />

matter. This may bring environmental protection agencies into play (as an enforcer).<br />

8.4 Evaluation Studies Available<br />

The list <strong>of</strong> studies that have been undertaken in respect <strong>of</strong> waste charging is<br />

extensive. However, much <strong>of</strong> the literature reports only on the high level outcomes in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> recycling and waste reduction. Rarely is there much by way <strong>of</strong> detailed<br />

discussion as to the outcomes <strong>of</strong> the scheme, and how these might be explained<br />

through reference to the specifics <strong>of</strong> the charging scheme, and the background<br />

collection system against which charges are introduced. Indeed, this has been one <strong>of</strong><br />

the main drivers behind our own attempts to carry out more detailed case studies in<br />

previous work. 155 156 157<br />

Other studies <strong>of</strong> interest are referred to through the body <strong>of</strong> this review.<br />

A recent study includes a summarised evidence base regarding the pros and cons <strong>of</strong><br />

charging systems with a reference list extending to over 50 case study reviews. The<br />

literature review covered Australia, Austria, Belgium (Flanders and Wallonia), Canada,<br />

Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, South Korea, Spain,<br />

155 Eunomia (2003) To Charge or Not to Charge? Final report to IWM (EB).<br />

156 Eunomia (2005) Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Local Authority Experience <strong>of</strong> Operating Household <strong>Waste</strong> Incentive<br />

Schemes, Defra.<br />

157 D. Hogg (2006) Impact <strong>of</strong> Unit-based <strong>Waste</strong> Collection Charges. Referred to within the text <strong>of</strong> this<br />

report as ‘the OECD charging review’. ENV/EPOC/WGWPR(2005)10/FINAL, Paris: OECD.<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!