14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

33.12 Complementary Policies<br />

Complementary policies are the landfill levy and its proposed expansion in scope, and<br />

the requirement to implement pay-by-use. The National <strong>Waste</strong> Prevention Programme<br />

also has a role to play, as does the proposal for a standard for composting. 635 Finally,<br />

the pace and ease with which the relevant treatment capacity can be developed will<br />

depend upon the manner <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> the Animal By-products Regulation.<br />

33.13 Effect <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Policy</strong> on Pricing <strong>of</strong> Resources / Services<br />

This is unclear and will be affected by the collection systems used, and the charging<br />

systems applied. The effect will also be influenced by the nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

counterfactual. With the proposed residual waste levy in place, it seems likely that the<br />

change in system costs would be negative, implying savings for households.<br />

33.14 Evasion and Enforcement<br />

The arrangements for enforcement are unclear as there is no deadline as such.<br />

However, the DoEHLG would be expected to play a role through its monitoring role in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> regional waste management plans in the short term. In addition, any<br />

revision <strong>of</strong> waste collection permits ought to reflect the Circular, though exactly how<br />

this is to be checked is unclear.<br />

33.15 Lessons Learned<br />

Probably the key lessons from the Circular thus far are that:<br />

541<br />

� The introduction <strong>of</strong> the desired collections has, understandably, not taken<br />

place ‘over night’;<br />

� There appears to be some resistance to the measure, supposedly on grounds<br />

that the approach will be expensive. It is not clear why this should necessarily<br />

affect the roll-out if the costs are recovered through charges. More<br />

fundamentally, there appears to be much for Ireland to learn with regard to<br />

optimising the design <strong>of</strong> collection services, specifically, taking advantage <strong>of</strong><br />

the possibilities for optimising logistics that biowaste collections might allow;<br />

and<br />

� Several companies appear wedded to ‘mixed waste’ biowaste treatments.<br />

Experience suggests that such approaches will tend to deliver low quality<br />

outputs which have the potential to damage the fledgling market for compost<br />

and digestion residuals. Mixed waste treatments might be more appropriately<br />

viewed as complements to, not substitutes for, separate collection <strong>of</strong><br />

biowaste. Indeed, this may yet be made a requirement in Ireland through EU<br />

635 See Munoo Prasad and Percy Foster (2009) Development <strong>of</strong> an Industry-led Quality Standard for<br />

Source-Separated Biodegradable Material Derived Compost (2006-WRM-DS-26), STRIVE Report No.<br />

22, Wexford: EPA.<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!