14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the effect <strong>of</strong> certain variables on residual waste per inhabitant. The equation<br />

developed suggests that for every additional Euro paid (on a variable rate) for residual<br />

waste, quantities fall by around 400g per inhabitant. The average payment for<br />

residual waste in Flanders is around €60-70 per household per year, giving a net<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> the order 24-28 kg per inhabitant per year (with additional effects<br />

potentially attributable to the proportion <strong>of</strong> costs covered through direct means). The<br />

Flemish experience is significant in that the country has set a target for residual<br />

waste to be no more than 150kg per inhabitant across the whole region. The<br />

equation does not give evidence <strong>of</strong> waste prevention per se. It does, however, give<br />

some indication <strong>of</strong> the combined effect <strong>of</strong> recycling and waste prevention at the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the individual. It does so taking into account a range <strong>of</strong> variables including personal<br />

income per inhabitant, collection frequencies, and whether organic wastes are<br />

collected.<br />

A demonstration <strong>of</strong> the price responsiveness <strong>of</strong> residual waste disposal to the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

sacks is given in Figure 8-5. The extensive literature review <strong>of</strong> price elasticities (ε)<br />

under different charging schemes summarised within the Defra charging review is<br />

reproduced here in Table 8-6. This table groups studies according to the type <strong>of</strong><br />

scheme used (with the exception <strong>of</strong> those looking at various scheme types). It can be<br />

seen that there is a tendency for the elasticity (for refuse quantities) to increase<br />

moving through volume-based, to sack-based to weight-based schemes. This ranking<br />

reinforces trends demonstrated in the Dijkgraaf and Gradus work shown in Table 8-3<br />

in Section 8.5.3 above.<br />

Figure 8-5: Plot <strong>of</strong> Residual <strong>Waste</strong> per Inhabitant (y-axis) Against Sack Price (x-axis) for<br />

Flemish Schemes<br />

Source: Hogg, D., Wilson, D., Gibbs, A., Astley, M., Papineschi, J. (2006) Modelling the Impact <strong>of</strong><br />

Household Charging for <strong>Waste</strong> in England, Final Report to Defra.<br />

139<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!