14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

63.1.3.2 Diesel<br />

We have used a figure <strong>of</strong> 3.09 kg CO2 equivalent per litre <strong>of</strong> diesel (including 0.46 kg<br />

CO2 equivalent pre-combustion emissions). External damage costs with respect to<br />

climate change associated with diesel use are therefore €0.09 per litre <strong>of</strong> diesel. 1208<br />

Data regarding the air quality impacts associated with the use <strong>of</strong> diesel within waste<br />

management facilities is taken from the BUWAL life-cycle inventory database<br />

produced by the Federal Office for the Environment in Switzerland. 1209 Total damage<br />

costs are €1.66 per litre <strong>of</strong> diesel if the high external costs are assumed, or €0.57 per<br />

litre using the lower costs. Approximately 12% <strong>of</strong> the total damage cost relates to precombustion<br />

emissions. The external costs are dominated by NOx externalities which<br />

equate to 99% <strong>of</strong> the air pollution impacts associated with diesel use.<br />

63.1.4 Emissions Avoided Through Recycling<br />

Recovery <strong>of</strong> material from the residual waste stream occurs at incineration and MBT<br />

facilities, as well as at recycling facilities.<br />

Most studies provide estimates <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gas reductions delivered by ‘front-end’<br />

collection and recovery systems, i.e. kerbside or bring recycling, followed if necessary<br />

by sorting within a Materials Recovery Facility (if collected in commingled form).<br />

Materials recovered from residual wastes, however, have higher levels <strong>of</strong><br />

contamination as a result <strong>of</strong> contact with the mixed residual waste stream.<br />

Depending upon the material, this contamination may have the following impacts:<br />

986<br />

� Rather than a ‘closed-loop’ process, materials might be recycled into lower<br />

value applications (for example, mixed glass to aggregates or plastics to<br />

“plaswood”, which deliver reduced, if any, carbon benefits); and<br />

� Prior to reprocessing, contaminated materials will require energy for cleaning<br />

processes - for example, hot-washing <strong>of</strong> plastics - and thus will deliver lower<br />

carbon benefits than clean streams.<br />

The current analysis attributes the same greenhouse gas benefits to recyclables<br />

removed from residual waste as those obtained through specific collections. For most<br />

dry recyclables, this is a broadly acceptable approach since the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

contamination are probably such as to affect price more than the associated benefits.<br />

However, the approach probably overstates the benefits associated with this practice<br />

at present, though this will be true only where it is assumed that plastics are<br />

extracted for recycling. Table 63-2 provides a summary <strong>of</strong> the values used.<br />

1208 There is relatively little difference between the high and low damage costs for climate change<br />

impacts.<br />

1209 Available from http://www.bafu.admin.ch<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!