14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cadmium was, until recently, a component <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the most widely used<br />

rechargeable batteries and according to the Commission proposal itself, 75% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

2,638 tonnes cadmium used in the EU-15 are incorporated in batteries and<br />

accumulators. Of these 1,984 tons, between 75% and 80% are used in the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> portable nickel-cadmium (NiCd) batteries. This corresponds to<br />

quantities between 1,488 and 1,587 tonnes <strong>of</strong> cadmium.<br />

The Batteries Directive (2006/66/EC) repeals Directive 91/157/EEC on Batteries<br />

and Accumulators Containing Certain Dangerous Substances, which introduced a<br />

limited range <strong>of</strong> environmental and product design requirements. The previous<br />

Directive was somewhat weak because it only covered an estimated 7% <strong>of</strong> consumer<br />

batteries on the EU market. In the words <strong>of</strong> the Commission the original Directive<br />

“has not succeeded in controlling adequately the risks they [batteries] pose”. There<br />

was also heavy resistance from industry and it was acknowledged that more research<br />

on certain substances was needed before more complete regulations were issued.<br />

When the Directive was revised to cover a wider range <strong>of</strong> batteries, all actors in the<br />

waste management chain became involved, from producer to the consumer through<br />

to collectors and reprocessors, rather than affecting product design with substance<br />

bans that manufacturers claimed were unreasonable.<br />

Consultations to revisions <strong>of</strong> the first battery Directive started in 1997, giving all<br />

interested parties a voice in legislation and policy, especially in assessing the<br />

directive’s economic, environmental and social impact.<br />

The proposal for a new Batteries Directive was made by the European Commission on<br />

24 November 2003, covering all batteries (for environmental and trade reasons).<br />

Following negotiation, the new Directive was adopted on 6 September 2006 and<br />

came into force on 26 September 2006.<br />

All Member States were required to transpose the Directive into national law by 26<br />

September 2008. At the time <strong>of</strong> writing only nine have made the transposition;<br />

Austria, Estonia, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Malta, the Netherlands, Slovenia and Spain.<br />

Three other Member States (Lithuania, Poland, Finland) have partially transposed the<br />

Batteries Directive, and a warning from the EC that it will take infringement action<br />

against member states if they do not “rapidly implement” the revised Batteries<br />

Directive is likely to spur non-conforming countries into action.<br />

Another principal driver for the policy is the sheer volume <strong>of</strong> battery waste that is<br />

generated each year, the rate at which this has been growing in recent years and is<br />

predicted to continue to grow. The European Commission’s Extended Impact<br />

Assessment (COM(2003)723 final), (EIA)) which supported the proposal to introduce<br />

the new Batteries Directive, estimated that the consumer battery market in Western<br />

Europe 536 had grown by some 70%, in terms <strong>of</strong> units sold, between 1985 and<br />

Paper, November 2003.<br />

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/batteries/pdf/exten_impact_assessment.pdf<br />

536 EU 15 plus Norway and Switzerland.<br />

460<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!