14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

monitored during and after the project. The funding body should take action if<br />

expected outcomes were not achieved. Finally, information<br />

Principle 4: Maximise environmental effect from available funds<br />

Quantitative and qualitative information on projects’ costs should be submitted in a<br />

standard format in order to allow verification, analysis and indicate costeffectiveness.<br />

Principle 5: Leverage additional finance<br />

Public funds should not fund 100% project costs and the percentage <strong>of</strong> project costs<br />

borrowed, or financial leverage, should be used to assess the programme’s<br />

performance. Public funding should not distort competition in the market.<br />

Quantifying the overall environmental benefits <strong>of</strong> a fund is very difficult because<br />

although case studies are usually available they are very succinct. The following<br />

examples aim to give an overview <strong>of</strong> the environmental impacts.<br />

WRAP WRAP WRAP Aggregate Aggregate Capital Capital Grant Grant Support Support<br />

In 2007 a WRAP report suggested that the capital investment they had provided so<br />

far had resulted in the addition <strong>of</strong> more than 3.6 million tonnes <strong>of</strong> annual recycling<br />

capacity. As well as this significant increase in capacity the focus has been on<br />

increasing the production <strong>of</strong> high quality recycled aggregate<br />

With the announcement <strong>of</strong> the fund in Scotland and Wales being in 2008 the projects<br />

will not yet have been completed. However, the fund’s environmental impact in<br />

England can be illustrated via the following short case study produced by WRAP:<br />

924<br />

29/09/09<br />

� Eppleton Quarry Products Ltd received £101,000 for mobile plant for the<br />

extraction <strong>of</strong> secondary aggregates from slag. This resulted in an increased<br />

capacity which rose from 125,000 tonnes to 505,000 <strong>of</strong> quality recycled<br />

aggregate. The environmental benefits <strong>of</strong> this are two-fold: as a direct<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the project a greater quantity <strong>of</strong> waste is diverted away from<br />

landfill in order to be recycled into quality aggregate material; and there is<br />

potential for this to reduce the demand for virgin aggregate. The extraction<br />

process can create noise, it’s unsightly and requires transportation from<br />

the quarry to the site.. 1139<br />

Aggregates ggregates Levy evy Sustainability<br />

ustainability Fund und<br />

A summary report <strong>of</strong> the ALSF in its first four years, since 2002, was published by<br />

Defra. The main environmental achievements were:<br />

� funding equipment with the capacity to recycle 1.7 million tonnes <strong>of</strong><br />

construction and demolition waste or process secondary aggregate;<br />

� making improvements at or around existing or disused quarries; and<br />

1139 WRAP Applying for a WRAP Capital Grant?, Available:<br />

http://www.wrap.org.uk/businesses/business_and_markets/capital_grants.html

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!