14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

57.5.1 Barriers to Uptake <strong>of</strong> Green Public Procurement<br />

The European Commission’s ‘Public Procurement for a Better Environment: Impact<br />

Assessment’ details specific problems and barriers which are known to hinder the<br />

uptake <strong>of</strong> green public procurement. They are listed below, but further details can be<br />

found in the source document:<br />

860<br />

29/09/09<br />

1. Lack <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> benefits, misperception <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> costs, and<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> political priority for GPP;<br />

2. Legal problems;<br />

3. Lack <strong>of</strong> information and tools for GPP, inadequate training structures, lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> priority areas and absence <strong>of</strong> easy to apply GPP criteria;<br />

and<br />

4. A lack <strong>of</strong> similarity between GPP procedures and criteria across the EU.<br />

It is also felt that perceived legal problems, and general misperception over the scale<br />

<strong>of</strong> the green procurement implementation process, hinder the take up <strong>of</strong> such a<br />

policy. 1083<br />

57.5.2 Administrative Costs<br />

Green procurement leads to consideration <strong>of</strong> a product or service’s whole life costs.<br />

The overall saving made through implementation <strong>of</strong> GPP depends on the<br />

administrative costs involved, and whether or not they <strong>of</strong>fset the savings. A report to<br />

Defra in 2006, which undertook a cost benefit analysis on sustainable public<br />

procurement, found evidence to suggest that savings are made over time when the<br />

GPP process has been established and administrative tasks have been integrated.<br />

This means that the majority <strong>of</strong> associated costs are ‘one-<strong>of</strong>f’ and once embedded<br />

into the system they can begin to deliver value. As policy implementation internalises<br />

environmental performance (emissions trading etc.) then Green Procurement starts<br />

to become more cost-effective.<br />

Administrative costs will depend on the current procurement processes in place, and<br />

how these are managed. On average, individual authorities who are setting up and<br />

implementing GPP spend a total <strong>of</strong> €223/1000 inhabitants over 2-6 years. 1084<br />

57.6 Conclusions<br />

In light <strong>of</strong> the European framework which is in place, Member States ought to be<br />

striving to reach the target <strong>of</strong> 50% for the average level <strong>of</strong> green public procurement<br />

by 2010. This target seems unlikely to be met by Ireland, and there is not yet any<br />

formalised commitment to this as far as we are aware. The formalised EU framework<br />

1083 National Audit Office (2009) Addressing the Environmental Impacts <strong>of</strong> Government Procurement,<br />

Available: http://www.nao.org.uk//idoc.ashx?docId=56417d76-45d6-4181-916cda4c00b1bc88&version=-1<br />

1084 Oko-Institut (2007) Costs and Benefits <strong>of</strong> Green Public Procurement in Europe, Available:<br />

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/eu_recommendations_2.pdf

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!