14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For automotive and industrial batteries the higher the collection targets, the lower the<br />

environmental damages due to transport (recycling benefits increase more than<br />

transport negative impacts). The total environmental benefits <strong>of</strong> a ban on landfill for<br />

automotive and industrial batteries are difficult to quantify since the heavy metal<br />

content <strong>of</strong> leachate is difficult to predict on the basis <strong>of</strong> current knowledge.<br />

Furthermore, as stated above, recycling rates for automotive batteries are already<br />

high.<br />

25.6 Collection Performance and Key Drivers<br />

It is at this point interesting to consider the relative success <strong>of</strong> different approaches<br />

to the collection <strong>of</strong> portable batteries.<br />

Until recently one <strong>of</strong> the problems when comparing collection rates across different<br />

countries has been the method <strong>of</strong> calculation for this indicator. Various collection rate<br />

methodologies have been used, including as a percentage <strong>of</strong> sales, percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

spent batteries, and as a percentage <strong>of</strong> spent batteries available for collection. These<br />

three different methodologies lead to quite different ‘collection rates’ and so it is<br />

important to understand what is actually being reported by a particular country to<br />

avoid misleading claims. Table 25-3 provides a summary <strong>of</strong> the leading portable<br />

battery collectors in the EU, showing collection rates as a percentage <strong>of</strong> sales and so<br />

all countries are benchmarked evenly.<br />

Table 25-3: Leading EU Portable Battery Collection Performance in 2002<br />

469<br />

Country Country<br />

Belgium Belgium<br />

France France<br />

Germany Germany Netherland Netherlands<br />

Netherland<br />

Association BEBAT SCRELEC GRS STIBAT<br />

Starting Date 1996 2001 1998 1995<br />

Collection System<br />

Inhabitants per<br />

Collection Point<br />

Bring back –<br />

different types<br />

<strong>of</strong> collection<br />

points<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes<br />

Bring back –<br />

point <strong>of</strong> sale and<br />

municipal<br />

collection points<br />

Bring back –<br />

predominately<br />

point <strong>of</strong> sale<br />

Bring back<br />

system with<br />

small chemical<br />

waste<br />

500 2,000 - 2,500 410 1,500<br />

Tonnes Collected 2,368 4,139 11,256 1,876<br />

Collection Rate (% <strong>of</strong><br />

sales)<br />

60% 16% 38% 32%<br />

Grams/inhabitant/year 228 69 137 116<br />

Source: BIO Intelligence Service (2003), Impact Assessment on Selected <strong>Policy</strong> Options for Revision <strong>of</strong><br />

the Battery Directive, Final Report for EC, July 2003.<br />

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/batteries/pdf/eia_batteries_final.pdf<br />

Looking at Table 25-3 it can be seen that all countries have very similar collection<br />

systems in place - consumer bring back collection points <strong>of</strong> various types. Whilst it is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!