14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 59-11: Evolution in Quantities <strong>of</strong> Household <strong>Waste</strong>, Residual <strong>Waste</strong>, and<br />

Separately Collected <strong>Waste</strong> (kg per inhabitant)<br />

Source: Danny Willle (2006) The Polluter Pays: Key to Successful Household <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>,<br />

Presentation to ACR+ Conference, Dublin Castle, 19th May 2006.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> waste prevention the question is: to what degree has the per capita<br />

residual waste target reduced arisings versus simply stimulating greater recovery<br />

from the waste stream? The data suggests that the reduction in residual waste per<br />

capita has come substantially from an increase in recycling. This is shown in Figure<br />

59-11 above.<br />

<strong>Waste</strong> Arisings grew by an average <strong>of</strong> 2.9% per annum over the period 1991 – 2002.<br />

However, in the period since 1998, when the first target was introduced, the growth in<br />

arisings has slowed considerably. In the 1998-2004 period, the line <strong>of</strong> best fit<br />

suggests an average growth rate <strong>of</strong> 0.42%, though the correlation <strong>of</strong> this fit is poor. In<br />

the period 2000-2004, the line <strong>of</strong> best fit actually suggests a decrease <strong>of</strong> 0.44% per<br />

annum, though again, the correlation is poor, and inspection by eye suggests zero net<br />

growth over the period.<br />

While the measures taken by OVAM have clearly not reduced overall arisings in<br />

absolute terms, the question can be asked as to whether the rate <strong>of</strong> growth might<br />

have been different in a counterfactual scenario. This is difficult to say, but if the<br />

trend from 1991-2002 had continued from 1998, the arisings per inhabitant would<br />

have been 628kg per inhabitant by 2004. The policy could, under this assumption,<br />

have been responsible for a 10.8% reduction in overall waste quantities over the 6<br />

year period.<br />

Even here, however, the matter is not so clear. Generally, the pre-1998 evolution<br />

shows that prior to this date, overall waste arisings were increasing as recycling rates<br />

improved. This may well have been due to the roll out <strong>of</strong> biowaste collections to<br />

households, generating ‘above background’ growth rates. Notwithstanding this fact,<br />

894<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!