14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the sale <strong>of</strong> water in glass bottles dropped by almost one percent; for s<strong>of</strong>t drinks, the<br />

reduction was half <strong>of</strong> one percent, indicating a marginal impact.<br />

30.5.1.2 Choice <strong>of</strong> the Submitted Products<br />

An environmental rationale for the choice <strong>of</strong> product subject to an ecotax is not<br />

always clear. As explained above, the introduction <strong>of</strong> the ecotaxes has known a rather<br />

turbulent legislative history, where competing interests and changing political<br />

configurations have played an important role. The products submitted to the ecotax<br />

tended to be rather visible, mainly household or consumer oriented products, usually<br />

linked to a well known waste issue. They do correspond, in large part, with the waste<br />

types that were defined as priority waste streams in the process <strong>of</strong> the fifth<br />

environmental action programme. The result is a set <strong>of</strong> waste streams subject to the<br />

ecotax for which also European legislation, and especially EPR mechanisms, have<br />

been established later (such as packaging and packaging waste and batteries). A<br />

more scientific approach, with an exercise to prioritise waste streams in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental impact, could be useful either in the definition <strong>of</strong> waste streams for<br />

which a take-back obligation should be implemented, or for which an ecotax would be<br />

beneficial.<br />

30.5.1.3 Sales Evolution <strong>of</strong> Products Submitted to Ecotaxes<br />

It is statistically not possible to prove a relationship between sales figures <strong>of</strong> products<br />

and the effects <strong>of</strong> the introduction <strong>of</strong> ecotaxes. However, some trends can be<br />

observed in which the ecotax might have played a role.<br />

FOST-Plus shows that the quantity <strong>of</strong> single use packaging is still increasing, but<br />

suggests that a decoupling between this increase and the growth in the economy has<br />

taken place between 1995 and 2006. Figure 30-1 shows that the amount <strong>of</strong> single<br />

use packaging increased in the Belgian market by 55, 000 tonnes over this period. A<br />

large part <strong>of</strong> the single use household packaging consists <strong>of</strong> beverage packaging<br />

submitted to ecotax. An important year is 2004, when the exemption from ecotax for<br />

beverage packaging was abolished. This coincides with the stabilisation <strong>of</strong> the market<br />

<strong>of</strong> single use packaging (see Figure 30-1), though this does not necessarily prove a<br />

causal relationship between the two. It might simply suggest some support for any<br />

ongoing measures to encourage use <strong>of</strong> reusable packaging.<br />

518<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!