14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ireland would be able to meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the Directive in the best manner<br />

possible. In the absence <strong>of</strong> a system <strong>of</strong> de-registration, several methods <strong>of</strong> estimation<br />

were used in an EPA study carried out in 2002. 476 These studies consisted <strong>of</strong> both<br />

direct and indirect methods. The direct methods involved surveying metal recovery<br />

operators and the single metal recycler in Ireland, which was in operation until June<br />

2001. The indirect methods consisted <strong>of</strong> using formulae developed by the European<br />

Topic Centre on <strong>Waste</strong>. Statistics provided by the DoEHLGs Vehicle Registration Unit<br />

were also used. Two methods were considered to provide the most accurate<br />

estimates. The survey <strong>of</strong> the metal shredding facilities provided an estimate <strong>of</strong><br />

176,632 ELVs in 2000. The adjusted ETC/W method provided an estimate <strong>of</strong><br />

217,203 ELVs in 2000.<br />

22.5.1 Evaluation Studies Available<br />

In the absence <strong>of</strong> any existing published information on ELVs in Ireland, the EPA<br />

carried out a study in 2002 (as outlined above) highlights the situation at the time<br />

with regard to the arisings and management <strong>of</strong> ELVs in Ireland. 477<br />

A Statement on Regulatory Impact <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> (End <strong>of</strong> Life Vehicles)<br />

Regulations 2006 was published by the DoEHLG in May 2006. 478 This document<br />

assessed the likely impacts, effects and costs associated with implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ELV Directive.<br />

The European Parliament issued a report in 2007 assessing the current state <strong>of</strong><br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the ELV Directive by Member States. 479 This document suggests<br />

that it is too early to draw definitive conclusions as to whether targets for recycling<br />

and recovery have been widely met or not.<br />

A paper was circulated by Duncan Laurence Environmental in February 2007. This<br />

paper provides a legislation summary <strong>of</strong> the ELV Regulations. 480<br />

22.6 Environmental Benefits<br />

The uncontrolled disposal <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> life vehicles can pose a serious threat to the<br />

environment due to the materials contained in them and the method in which they<br />

are managed. The overriding aim <strong>of</strong> the Regulations is to protect the environment and<br />

human health.<br />

476 EPA (2002) End <strong>of</strong> Life Vehicles – A Sectoral Report.<br />

477 EPA (2002) End <strong>of</strong> Life Vehicles – A Sectoral Report<br />

478 <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Environment, Heritage & Local Government (May 2006) Statement on<br />

Regulatory Impact – <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> (End <strong>of</strong> Life Vehicles) Regulations 2006.<br />

479 European Parliament 2007: End <strong>of</strong> Life Vehicles (ELV) Directive - An Assessment <strong>of</strong> the Current<br />

state <strong>of</strong> Implementation by Member States.<br />

480 Duncan Laurence Environmental (February 2007) <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> End <strong>of</strong> Life Vehicles<br />

Regulations 2006, Legislation Summary.<br />

423<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!