14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

965<br />

associated with fuel used within facilities, the latter is used to determine<br />

avoided emissions resulting from energy generated by facilities. 1190<br />

WRATE’s default assumption is that heat generation <strong>of</strong>fsets use <strong>of</strong> gas-fuelled heat<br />

generation. We have retained this assumption.<br />

Our assessment is carried out on the basis <strong>of</strong> impacts associated with 1 tonne <strong>of</strong><br />

residual waste sent to each treatment facility. The results presented in the following<br />

sections are not directly comparable to those produced by the FTC analysis, as the<br />

latter also considered impacts associated with collection and recycling <strong>of</strong> 100,000<br />

tonnes <strong>of</strong> waste within each <strong>of</strong> their four scenarios.<br />

Our analysis considers the performance <strong>of</strong> the following thermal treatment facilities<br />

against key WRATE criteria:<br />

� Chineham incinerator, generating electricity only (Incin Elec C in the graphs);<br />

� Dundee incinerator, generating electricity only (Incin Elec D);<br />

� Billingham incinerator, generating electricity only (Incin Elec B);<br />

� Coventry incinerator, generating electricity and heat (Incin CHP C);<br />

� Grimsby incinerator, generating electricity and heat (Incin CHP G).<br />

The WRATE model includes two categories <strong>of</strong> MBT process – the “generic” processes<br />

modelled using data obtained through literature published on MBT processes – and<br />

proprietary processes (e.g. the Ecodeco process) compiled using data provided by<br />

facility operators wherever possible. Whilst the FTC analysis considered only the two<br />

generic processes, we have included two additional facilities within the analysis that<br />

follows:<br />

� The Arrowbio Anaerobic Digestion-based MBT plant;<br />

� The Ecodeco MBT facility (producing an SRF which is sent to the Chineham<br />

incinerator, generating electricity only).<br />

In each case, the performance <strong>of</strong> the MBT and incineration facilities is compared to<br />

that <strong>of</strong> landfill.<br />

62.1.1 WRATE Impact Assessment<br />

The default impact assessment method within WRATE considers the performance <strong>of</strong><br />

technology options against the following criteria:<br />

1. Abiotic Resource Depletion<br />

2. Global Warming Potential<br />

3. Human Toxicity Potential<br />

1190 The baseline mix includes 22% Coal, 54% Gas and 11% Peat. See: Energy <strong>Policy</strong> Statistical<br />

Support Unit (2008) Energy in Ireland 1990 – 2007, Report for Sustainable Energy Ireland, December<br />

2008.<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!