14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Article 9.1 <strong>of</strong> EU Directive 94/62 on packaging and packaging waste requires<br />

Member States to ensure that with effect from 31 December 1997, packaging may<br />

be placed on the market only if it complies with all Essential Requirements. The<br />

Packaging (Essential Requirements) Regulations were introduced in Ireland in 1998<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> an amendment to the <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> (Packaging) Regulations 1997.<br />

A Repak report <strong>of</strong> 2008 identifies the key decision makers within a number <strong>of</strong><br />

packaging supply chains and highlights both opportunities and obstacles for<br />

packaging prevention and minimisation. 245 The report examines a number <strong>of</strong><br />

common products and works back through the supply chain to identify the factors and<br />

dynamics <strong>of</strong> packaging decisions. This is done in order to enforce the notion that<br />

packaging can be kept to the minimum adequate amount to maintain safety hygiene<br />

and acceptance by the customer, as set out in the packaging Essential Requirements.<br />

The report notes also that reducing packaging also reduces the cost <strong>of</strong> procurement,<br />

fuel consumption and vehicle movements.<br />

The implementation and enforcement <strong>of</strong> the Essential Requirements aspects has not<br />

been a major thrust <strong>of</strong> the existing Regulations thus far.<br />

Repak’s submission and feedback in relation to packaging waste prevention is given<br />

in the subsection above on Responses from Industry. In their submission for this<br />

review Repak notes that:<br />

224<br />

29/09/09<br />

“The <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Environment, Heritage and Local Government, which is a<br />

member <strong>of</strong> the NSGPWR and participates in the Steering Group, has not<br />

adopted any formal policy or strategy. The only recent strategy measure<br />

adopted by the <strong>Department</strong> is to seek a voluntary packaging reduction<br />

agreement with the retail sector, as outlined above, but there is no clear<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> any endgame or developed strategy in what it is that the<br />

<strong>Department</strong> is seeking to achieve from this measure”.<br />

As mentioned in the Section 12.7.1 <strong>of</strong> these Annexes, the manner <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transposition and administration <strong>of</strong> the policy in Ireland means that the regulations<br />

do not provide quantitative objectives or a structure or by which to enforce packaging<br />

waste prevention. Industry feedback seems to suggest, as mentioned above, that in<br />

its current form the current packaging policy has too loose a structure within which<br />

prevention measures can be administered and enforced.<br />

12.11 Social and Distributional Consequences<br />

The social and distributional consequences <strong>of</strong> the existing system depend upon a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> variables. These include:<br />

1. For businesses, the degree to which compliance costs are linked to the size <strong>of</strong><br />

business, or to its nature, this, in turn, depending upon the net effect <strong>of</strong>:<br />

245 Perchards (2008) Report on Packaging Supply Chain (Packaging Prevention), Report for Repak,<br />

February 2008.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!