14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

from 15.4 % in 1994 to 49.2 % in 2004. 666<br />

Switzerland<br />

Statistics provided on the Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) 667 website<br />

indicate that the municipal waste recycling rate in Switzerland has been over 40 % for<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> years, with capture rates in 2006 for individual materials as follows:<br />

paper at 77 %, aluminium cans at 90 %, PET bottles at 76 %, biowaste at 34 % and<br />

glass particularly high at 95.6 %.<br />

Taiwan<br />

The original recycling target linked to the introduction <strong>of</strong> mandatory recycling in 2006<br />

was to reach 28.75 % by 2008; Taiwan had already exceeded this rate by 2007 with<br />

a recycling rate <strong>of</strong> 38.7%. 668<br />

New Jersey (USA)<br />

The total municipal (including businesses and institutions) recycling rate in New<br />

Jersey in 2006 was reported as 54.8 %. 669 A report by Schaumburg and Doyle (1994)<br />

condemned the mandatory recycling scheme in New Jersey due to the high cost <strong>of</strong><br />

administering and running such a system, whilst acknowledging that the policy has<br />

had a direct effect on increasing recycling rates. 670<br />

34.6 Implementation Costs<br />

In countries such as Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany and Switzerland, the<br />

minimum recycling standards for packaging materials are principally funded by<br />

producer responsibility schemes (which are in turn supported by pre-paid disposal<br />

fees). This means that in, for example, Switzerland, the producer fully funds<br />

aluminium collection, mostly funds glass collection and partly funds paper/cardboard<br />

collection. Such schemes are discussed in more detail in Section 13.0.<br />

By contrast, countries such as the UK and Denmark pay for their recycling collection<br />

schemes predominantly via local taxes. In Denmark, in some situations, pay-by-use is<br />

also used in some municipalities in order to promote source separation <strong>of</strong> waste (see<br />

Section 8.0). In the UK, in the past, the costs <strong>of</strong> implementation and running <strong>of</strong> door-<br />

666 OECD (2006) Impacts <strong>of</strong> Unit-Based <strong>Waste</strong> Collection Charges, Working Group on <strong>Waste</strong> Prevention<br />

and Recycling, Environment <strong>Policy</strong> Committee.<br />

667 Available at http://www.bafu.admin.ch/abfall/01517/01519/index.html?lang=en<br />

668 Environmental Protection Administration (2008) Taiwan’s Zero <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> to Meet 2008 Goal in<br />

Advance, available at<br />

http://www.epa.gov.tw/en/epashow.aspx?list=112&path=11972&guid=c26aa5d0-a280-4e72-9a38a0b4f1e2bdff&lang=en-us<br />

669 New Jersey <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Environmental Protection (2006) New Jersey Generation, Disposal and<br />

Recycling Statistics, available online at<br />

http://www.state.nj.us/dep/dshw/recycling/stat_links/06%20Disposal_%20Rates_%20County.pdf.<br />

670 G.W. Shaumburg and K.T. Doyle (1994) Wasting Resources to Reduce <strong>Waste</strong>: Recycling in New<br />

Jersey, Cato <strong>Policy</strong> Analysis, 202.<br />

557<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!