14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

quality for materials collected, though this typically only partially covers the collection<br />

costs for these materials. Producer responsibility for packaging and other materials is<br />

studied separately in Annexes 19.0 to 26.0.<br />

8.2.3 United States<br />

In the United States, the role <strong>of</strong> state government is to develop plans and standards,<br />

while local government implements solid waste policy. Thus, individual states and<br />

municipalities typically develop municipal solid waste (MSW) management plans<br />

within which direct charging systems can be proposed and consulted upon. As such,<br />

charging systems in the U.S. have evolved over time. In the past, markets for waste<br />

were highly decentralised (with householders taking waste to dumps). Once it was<br />

decided to run more formalized collection operations, two main routes were followed:<br />

a) an equivalent to a local authority run collection service, accompanied by local<br />

authority billing, and b) a contract / franchise approach, the key difference being that<br />

in the latter the contractor / franchisee (not the municipality) was responsible for<br />

billing households. 152<br />

Municipalities have been able to pass ordinances asking households to 'hire their<br />

own company', and although examples <strong>of</strong> this competitive model (similar to the<br />

approaches in Ireland) still exist, a single collector is now the norm.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> municipalities using PAYT schemes in the US stands at more than<br />

6,000, covering a population <strong>of</strong> 50 million. Pay-per-bin and pay-per-bag schemes are<br />

the most commonly used, though weight based systems have seen increasing<br />

prevalence (27 communities in the state <strong>of</strong> Maine alone by 2006). 153 154<br />

8.2.4 Korea<br />

Korea became the first country to introduce a mandatory DVR scheme country wide<br />

when, in 1995, the volume-based waste fee (VBWF) was introduced. The VBWF is<br />

essentially a pay-per-sack scheme under which households are required to place<br />

residual waste in pre-paid sacks whilst recyclables are collected free <strong>of</strong> charge.<br />

Charges are also levied on the collection <strong>of</strong> bulky wastes.<br />

In recent years, the country has introduced free food waste collections for<br />

households, having commenced collections for larger producers <strong>of</strong> food waste (such<br />

as restaurants) in 1997. In 2005, the landfilling <strong>of</strong> kitchen waste from households<br />

was banned.<br />

152 Thomas Kinnaman and Don Fullerton (1999) The Economics <strong>of</strong> Solid <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong>, NBER<br />

Working Paper 7326, Massachussets, August 1999.<br />

153 Lisa Skumatz (2002) Variable Rate or ‘Pay-as-you-throw’ <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong>: Answers to<br />

Frequently Asked Questions, Los Angeles: Reason Foundation, July 2002.<br />

154 Jan Canterbury, Sue Eisenfeld (2006) The Rise and . . . Rise <strong>of</strong> Pay-As-You-Throw, MSW<br />

<strong>Management</strong>, Elements, www.mswmanagement.com/elements-2006/waste-managementchallenges.aspx.<br />

122<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!