14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

specific actors, or failing that, to take a very active role in reviewing policy to ensure<br />

the targets are met.<br />

59.1 Key Irish Targets<br />

The main Irish targets are set out below (see also Annex 6.0). Some, though by no<br />

means all, <strong>of</strong> these targets are set as a direct consequence <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> EU<br />

Directives. We highlight, alongside each, the issues with the targets as they were<br />

framed:<br />

From Changing Our Ways:<br />

869<br />

� Diverting 50% <strong>of</strong> household waste away from landfill by 2013;<br />

No clear addressee; no sanction for non-compliance; and limited policy drivers<br />

until very recently;<br />

� A minimum 65% reduction in biodegradable wastes consigned to landfill by<br />

2013;<br />

No addressee(s); no sanction for non-compliance; limited policy drivers until<br />

very recently; relevance not clear when set alongside other targets (for<br />

example, even if waste had not grown, the suggestion is that recycling would<br />

account for a relatively small fraction <strong>of</strong> the reduction);<br />

� The development <strong>of</strong> waste recovery facilities employing environmentally<br />

beneficial technologies, as an alternative to landfill, including the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> composting and other feasible biological treatment facilities<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> treating up to 300,000 tonnes <strong>of</strong> biodegradable waste per annum<br />

by 2013;<br />

No addressee(s); no sanction for non-compliance; limited policy drivers (and<br />

arguably, the ABPR has acted to limit development here, until very recently);<br />

potential for perverse outcomes (the ‘up to 300,000 tonnes’ potentially<br />

constrains capacity – it is likely that a figure in excess <strong>of</strong> this will be required<br />

by 2013);<br />

� Recycling <strong>of</strong> 35% <strong>of</strong> municipal waste by 2013;<br />

No addressee(s); no sanction for non-compliance; limited policy drivers; too<br />

easily achievable;<br />

� Recycling at least 50% <strong>of</strong> C&D waste within a five year period (by 2003), with<br />

a progressive increase to at least 85% over fifteen years (by 2013);<br />

No addressee(s); no sanction for non-compliance; limited policy drivers;<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> interim measures;<br />

� Rationalisation <strong>of</strong> municipal waste landfills, with progressive and sustained<br />

reductions in numbers, leading to an integrated network <strong>of</strong> some 20 state-<strong>of</strong>the-art<br />

facilities incorporating energy recovery and high standards <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental protection;<br />

Implicitly, this is aimed at the EPA and planners. It is not obvious what the<br />

relevance <strong>of</strong> the figure <strong>of</strong> 20 is, but the figure is specified in an appropriately<br />

vague manner;<br />

� An 80% reduction in methane emissions from landfill, which will make a<br />

useful contribution to meeting Ireland's international obligations;<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!