14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In addition to variations in the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the charge, there are also variations in<br />

the visibility <strong>of</strong> the charge. In some areas the ‘eco-fee’ is visible and can be identified<br />

by consumers. There are, however, areas where the fee is hidden and simply<br />

included in the price <strong>of</strong> the paints.<br />

32.1.2 Key Organisations Involved in Implementation and <strong>Management</strong><br />

The organisation responsible for the management <strong>of</strong> the charge can vary dependent<br />

on the type <strong>of</strong> scheme implemented.<br />

Where enhanced producer responsibility schemes are utilised, revenue accrued is<br />

usually managed by a not-for-pr<strong>of</strong>it organisation, normally operated by industry. The<br />

organisation is also responsible for facilitating recycling activities by utilising the<br />

revenue accrued through the fund. A selected example follows.<br />

32.1.2.1 Product Care Scheme - Canada<br />

The Product Care scheme is a not-for-pr<strong>of</strong>it producer responsibility scheme which<br />

manages product stewardship programs for household hazardous and special waste<br />

on behalf <strong>of</strong> its members across Canada. The scheme manages stewardship<br />

programs in British Columbia for paint, flammable liquids, pesticides and gasoline,<br />

and in Nova Scotia, Saskatchewan and New Brunswick for paint only. 620<br />

In British Columbia, Product Care was enabled and created as a result <strong>of</strong> the Post-<br />

Consumer Paint Stewardship Program Regulation (British Columbia Regulation.<br />

200/94), which was enacted in 1994 under the <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Act.<br />

The Act requires paint producers take cradle-to-grave responsibility for the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> the products that contribute to the household hazardous waste<br />

stream. To maintain a "level playing field" amongst paint producers, the regulation<br />

was amended on June 26, 1997 to include all paints sold in pressurized containers<br />

(aerosols). In 2004, this regulation was replaced by the Recycling Regulation. 621<br />

32.2 Pre-implementation / Evaluation Studies Available<br />

In British Columbia, the pre-implementation report ‘Greener Homes, Cleaner<br />

Communities’ noted that legislation would be required to increase the capture in<br />

household hazardous waste, which includes paint. We have been unable to obtain a<br />

copy <strong>of</strong> this report but note that its findings were an important factor in the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the regulations in British Columbia.<br />

Considering the evaluation studies in British Columbia, Gardner Pinfold Consulting 622<br />

conducted an economic assessment <strong>of</strong> the Product Care scheme in British Columbia.<br />

620 Adapted from: http://productcare.org/about.html [Accessed March 2009]<br />

621 Adapted from http://www.ec.gc.ca/epr/default.asp?lang=En&n=3A0FB78D-1#programdetails<br />

[Accessed March 2009]<br />

622 Gardner Pinfold Consulting (2008) Economic Impacts <strong>of</strong> the BC Recycling Regulation, Report for<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment Environmental Quality Branch. Available at:<br />

http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/epd/recycling/resources/reports/econ.htm<br />

530<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!