22.07.2014 Views

Download - Sports In Brazil

Download - Sports In Brazil

Download - Sports In Brazil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>In</strong> other words, sport might b e understood comprehensively in present days<br />

but a twofold statement, that is by means of the ontological argument of sport as<br />

a being-in-it-self in natural circunstances and by the explanation of cultural<br />

identity of sport.<br />

Not surprisingly, Hans Lenk already in 1985 defined sport as a “cultural<br />

phenomenon on a natural biological basis” and more recently Ommo Grupe pointed<br />

out boldly: (3)<br />

Sport as a cultural phenomenon reaches far beyond the traditional boundaries<br />

of sport itself, it is the expression of a new understanding of culture.<br />

These interchangeable definitions are otherwise apart from the conception of<br />

sport as independent of things, in which the traditional view of universals is<br />

applied, similarly to the theory of play as elaborated by Johan Huizinga and<br />

others. (4) Actually, sport as an entity of nature pressuposes universals as existing<br />

within particulars (universalis in re) while the cultural meaning of sport refers to<br />

universals derived from particulars (universalia post res).<br />

But this universality cannot be regard as a basis for principles of judgement if<br />

the so called naturalistic fallacy is accepted as a philosophical criterion.<br />

Significantly this fallacy reduces from natural characteristics a nonnatural<br />

property. Nevertheless, distinguished philosophers such as Jürgen Habermas<br />

(foundationist) and Richard Rorty (antifoundationist) have been rejecting the<br />

naturalistic fallacy validity. (5) Thus, whether in universalist or in relativist points<br />

of view, sport in nature expresses values and sport in culture represents facts. As<br />

yet both interpretations are claiming universalizability although playing<br />

independent roles, not mutually exclusives.<br />

The ambivalence towards sports is furthermore similar to the ambivalence of<br />

globalization whish corresponds to diverse claims of universality. Milton Santos<br />

sees this controversy in the grounds of the universal dominance of man in<br />

postmodernity, contrasting with separate and disperse damages to life everywhere<br />

on Earth. (6) For Michel Serres, this self-degradation of society induced by<br />

technology is mainly referred to a demand of natural contract instead of social<br />

contract which formerly typified modernity (7) and also the Olympism proclaimed<br />

by Coubertin.<br />

SUSTAINABILITY AND ETHICS<br />

At this point of reasoning on environment and sport, the current proposition of<br />

sustainable development can illuminate the potential of natural contract. To<br />

enhance a sustainable society is to arrange development and environmental<br />

160 Meio ambiente, esporte, Lazer e turismo

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!