10.12.2012 Views

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> & <strong>Midwifery</strong>, <strong>Trinity</strong> College Dublin: 8 th Annual Interdisciplinary Research <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Transforming Healthcare Through Research, Education & Technology: 7 th – 9 th November 2007<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

from the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) and the possible<br />

psychological effects that completing DDCs had on patients. This<br />

was complemented by semi-structured interviews to explore the<br />

patients’ experience <strong>of</strong> completing the DDCs.<br />

By adopting a complementary design approach, it was possible to<br />

delineate the data each method generated and analyse it<br />

separately.<br />

Design<br />

This study is a randomised controlled trial, comprising two groups:<br />

an intervention group and a control group.<br />

Patients with breast or colorectal cancer receiving adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy (that is chemotherapy treatment after potentially<br />

curative surgery) were therefore randomly assigned to the<br />

treatment or control group. Randomisation was achieved as follows:<br />

the data manager within the cancer unit randomly allocated a<br />

patient number to either the intervention or the control group.<br />

Patient allocation was only revealed to the researcher after the<br />

patient had been given a study number. Through such<br />

randomisation, every participant had an equal chance <strong>of</strong> being<br />

included in the treatment or control group.<br />

Study setting, sample and selection<br />

All the patients recruited to this study were from a population <strong>of</strong><br />

patients attending a cancer unit pre-assessment chemotherapy<br />

clinic at a large District Hospital. They had been diagnosed with<br />

pathologically confirmed breast or colorectal cancer needing<br />

adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with a colorectal diagnosis<br />

received 5-fluorouracil (5FU) chemotherapy via a continuous<br />

infusion over twenty four weeks changed weekly or as a weekly<br />

injection <strong>of</strong> 5FU over twenty four weeks. Patients with a breast<br />

cancer diagnosis received either epirubicin at three weekly intervals<br />

for four cycles (Epi) followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate<br />

and 5FU (CMF) at three weekly intervals for four cycles, or 5FU,<br />

epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) given at three weekly<br />

intervals over six cycles.<br />

All new patients who fulfilled the entry criteria were approached by<br />

the researcher or a research nurse and asked to participate in this<br />

study prior to the commencement <strong>of</strong> their first chemotherapy<br />

treatment.<br />

All participants were given a description <strong>of</strong> this study including a<br />

written information sheet at their pre-assessment chemotherapy<br />

visit. A week later, and prior to commencing their chemotherapy,<br />

patients who had agreed to participate in the study were asked to<br />

sign a consent form. They were then randomised to either the<br />

intervention or control group by the data manager. Although<br />

patients were receiving chemotherapy for six cycles or twenty-four<br />

- 188 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!