10.12.2012 Views

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> & <strong>Midwifery</strong>, <strong>Trinity</strong> College Dublin: 8 th Annual Interdisciplinary Research <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Transforming Healthcare Through Research, Education & Technology: 7 th – 9 th November 2007<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

3. The Curriculum Development Process<br />

4. The Stakeholders<br />

5. Leadership<br />

6. Ethnic minorities<br />

Discussion<br />

Category 1: Existing Programme<br />

Although the process <strong>of</strong> developing new curricula has been amply<br />

described in available literature, it was interesting to note, that<br />

virtually no author ever mentions the “old” programmes <strong>of</strong>fered in<br />

the Department. In this project the stakeholders felt a need to talk<br />

about the previous degree. All <strong>of</strong> them recognised the need to<br />

change the then existing BHSc. (<strong>Nursing</strong>) programme. “I firmly<br />

believe that the curriculum needed challenging I thought”<br />

(Participant 1:21-23), or “But certainly my impression was that the<br />

older programme, the original programme, the old degree seemed<br />

to be tired and dated. It had not kept up with the changes in<br />

nursing practice and it was time to revise it. I think both in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

content but also in terms <strong>of</strong> approach and the actual structure <strong>of</strong><br />

the degree, how the papers were structured and how the progress<br />

through the degree was structured” (Participant 7:13-20).<br />

In educational circles it is now accepted that the information<br />

relevant to nurse education will double every 5 years (Barnard,<br />

Nash, and O’Brien, 2005:505), which support the stakeholders’<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> the need to change curriculum in order to keep up to<br />

date with the latest developments in the health sector. This was<br />

specifically necessary if it was expected <strong>of</strong> the graduates to meet all<br />

the needs <strong>of</strong> the New Zealand population in the future<br />

Category 2: The need to change<br />

In this main category it became evident that there were many<br />

reasons for changing the previous programme. These “drivers for<br />

change” included the Government <strong>of</strong> New Zealand's Primary Health<br />

Care policy, which led, amongst others, to an extension <strong>of</strong> the<br />

registered nurses’ roles.<br />

Baker et al. (1998:1-2) stated clearly that educational programmes<br />

for health care pr<strong>of</strong>essions need to identify the knowledge and skills<br />

necessary to meet the goal <strong>of</strong> improved community health. At MIT<br />

the lecturing staff and the Stakeholders were in agreement with this<br />

statement. Moreover, they felt that it was necessary for students to<br />

identify their own learning needs before selecting their final<br />

placements. By doing so, students would be able to meet their<br />

educational needs, and take more responsibility for their own<br />

education. “So it was really to facilitate the student more. But also<br />

- 451 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!