10.12.2012 Views

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> & <strong>Midwifery</strong>, <strong>Trinity</strong> College Dublin: 8 th Annual Interdisciplinary Research <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Transforming Healthcare Through Research, Education & Technology: 7 th – 9 th November 2007<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Fitness results were categorised into fitness categories taking age<br />

and gender into account. Table 1 shows the mean greatest<br />

improvements in fitness occurred in the lower fitness categories.<br />

Table 1: Improvements in fitness following a cardiac rehabilitation<br />

programme by fitness category<br />

Starting fitness level Mean changes in MET’s from entry<br />

to end <strong>of</strong> Phase III cardiac<br />

rehabilitation<br />

n<br />

1 Low 3.36 13<br />

2 Fair 2.58 6<br />

3 Average 1.37 8<br />

4 Good 1.88 13<br />

5 High 0.83 9<br />

6 Excellent -0.96 18<br />

When these results are examined from an individual point <strong>of</strong> view it<br />

is evident that at the lower fitness levels (levels 1, 2, 3 (low, fair<br />

and average fitness) the vast majority <strong>of</strong> patients improved their<br />

fitness level, a small proportion maintained their fitness level and<br />

none or a very small proportion showed a decline in their fitness<br />

level (see Figure 1). At starting fitness categories 4 (good) and 5<br />

(excellent) you get a large proportion <strong>of</strong> patients maintaining their<br />

fitness. This was what was expected at these levels <strong>of</strong> fitness<br />

particularly in view that <strong>of</strong> the fact that it was a sub maximal<br />

exercise stress test and as outlined in the methodology 34% <strong>of</strong><br />

patients achieved the maximum level <strong>of</strong> fitness measured. What<br />

was worrying was that in a small proportion <strong>of</strong> patients who<br />

commenced at fitness level stage 4 (good) and stage 5(excellent)<br />

their fitness declined over the period <strong>of</strong> the programme ( see Figure<br />

1).<br />

Figure 1: Changes in fitness level post programme categorised by<br />

pre programme fitness level<br />

- 545 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!