10.12.2012 Views

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> & <strong>Midwifery</strong>, <strong>Trinity</strong> College Dublin: 8 th Annual Interdisciplinary Research <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Transforming Healthcare Through Research, Education & Technology: 7 th – 9 th November 2007<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

than half the respondents (n = 51, 58.6%) felt that certification <strong>of</strong><br />

competencies were appropriate for nurses who intend to extend or<br />

expand their clinical roles.<br />

The combined responses to the Role Extension scale indicated that<br />

respondents had a generally positive attitude towards role<br />

extension. With 10 items in this scale and a total value <strong>of</strong> between<br />

10 and 50, where 50 is an extremely positive attitude, respondents<br />

attained a mean value <strong>of</strong> 30.8, varying between 18 and 45. The<br />

mean scores for individual items on the role extension scale was<br />

obtained and ranked in order, from the highest to lowest scores<br />

(Table 3). Mean scores <strong>of</strong> below 3 indicate a high level <strong>of</strong><br />

disagreement, whereas mean scores <strong>of</strong> above 3 indicate a high level<br />

<strong>of</strong> agreement to the individual item on the Role Extension scale. The<br />

data indicated that the highest scores, which indicated the highest<br />

level <strong>of</strong> agreement, were nurses’ mean response to the benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

role extension such as improving the quality and continuity <strong>of</strong><br />

patient care.<br />

Table 3 Ranked Mean Responses to Role Extension<br />

Improve quality <strong>of</strong> care<br />

Increase continuity <strong>of</strong> care<br />

Stess from increase<br />

workload<br />

Less time for nursing<br />

activites<br />

Reducing doctor's work?<br />

Increases collaboration<br />

Meet new needs<br />

Fragmentation <strong>of</strong> care?<br />

Delegation <strong>of</strong> tasks<br />

Money saving exercise<br />

Mean Std. Deviation<br />

3.6705 .95558<br />

3.6591 .94548<br />

3.5227 1.08254<br />

3.4886 1.20339<br />

3.3864 1.23579<br />

3.3750 .96267<br />

3.3636 1.10570<br />

3.1023 1.16500<br />

2.9773 1.31287<br />

2.9545 1.14379<br />

Rankings based on mean scores on a 5-item<br />

Likert scale identifying respondents’ degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> agreement or disagreement, with<br />

strongly disagree: 1, disagree: 2, unsure: 3,<br />

agree: 4, strongly agree: 5.<br />

The mean value <strong>of</strong> the Role Expansion scale showed that<br />

respondents in this study had a generally positive attitude towards<br />

the concept. Table 4 illustrates the mean scores for individual items<br />

in the Role Expansion scale, which were arranged in ranked order,<br />

from the highest to lowest mean scores. Mean scores <strong>of</strong> below 3<br />

- 524 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!