10.12.2012 Views

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> & <strong>Midwifery</strong>, <strong>Trinity</strong> College Dublin: 8 th Annual Interdisciplinary Research <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Transforming Healthcare Through Research, Education & Technology: 7 th – 9 th November 2007<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

system, and skin. Over half <strong>of</strong> the sample (50.7%) had metastasis.<br />

Two thirds <strong>of</strong> clients (66.7%) knew about their cancer diagnosis.<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> the sample (98.7%) reported having pain other<br />

than minor everyday pains, occurring most frequently in the<br />

abdomen, back, lower extremities, or a combination <strong>of</strong> areas. The<br />

mean pain rating during the past 24 hours at its worst was 8.42 (SD<br />

= 1.33) and at its least 3.10 (SD = 1.56). The mean pain severity<br />

on average was 5.30 (SD = 1.66); for pain right now, the mean was<br />

4.22 (SD = 2.00). The interference items had mean ratings ranging<br />

between 5.29 and 7.02 (SD = 1.95 to 2.47). All clients reported<br />

receiving pain medications, with opioids the most frequently used<br />

(46.6%) alone or in combination with other drugs. The majority <strong>of</strong><br />

clients (78.4%) reported more than 50% pain relief with<br />

treatments.<br />

The cultural sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the Arabic BPI was evaluated by a panel<br />

<strong>of</strong> oncology physicians and nurses, and a pain specialist. The items<br />

were rated on a 4-point scale (1 = Not at all culturally sensitive to 4<br />

= very culturally sensitive). The mean rating was 3.8 for all items,<br />

suggesting that the tool was culturally sensitive.<br />

The reliability <strong>of</strong> the Arabic BPI was tested with Cronbach’s alpha<br />

coefficient. The values were 0.82 for the severity items and 0.92 for<br />

the interference items.<br />

Construct validity was assessed by factor analysis using the<br />

principal component method with varimax rotation. The items<br />

loaded on two factors, with a structure replicating the dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />

severity and interference reported in previous studies. Convergent<br />

validity was assessed by correlating the mean <strong>of</strong> the item inquiring<br />

about pain now in the Arabic BPI with that <strong>of</strong> the Visual Analog<br />

Scale; Pearson r = 0.680 (p= 0.00)<br />

Correlations between the severity and interference items were<br />

positive and significant, with Pearson r values ranging between<br />

0.246-0.569 (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!