10.12.2012 Views

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> & <strong>Midwifery</strong>, <strong>Trinity</strong> College Dublin: 8 th Annual Interdisciplinary Research <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Transforming Healthcare Through Research, Education & Technology: 7 th – 9 th November 2007<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

done. I would say I was mostly informed, but there were definite<br />

things that were set up that weren’t mentioned, that I did not know<br />

anything about. It suddenly just appeared. That was at a little<br />

frustrating, because as was said, it was then assumed that we knew<br />

about it, because we were in the group together. We were the ones,<br />

facing our department team. They were saying ‘well what is all this<br />

about, where did this come from’ ‘We don’t know’. It was a little<br />

difficult in that way” (FGR: 510-522). It would appear that the<br />

perception existed that the internal flow <strong>of</strong> information was less<br />

effective. “The information flow was not, it was what was lacking.<br />

At that time information was not coming back to us” (FGR: 299-<br />

301). If this perception was true, then it would need looking at for<br />

future reference, but at the same time another perception also<br />

existed. “All I can say is that we did our best, we knew it was<br />

unfortunate but we did our best. But that certainly, I think our<br />

communication with people outside the department was effective,<br />

within the department there were just some little lags, where we<br />

could have perhaps been more onto it” (Participant 3: 100-106).<br />

So, some <strong>of</strong> the problems were known, but due to specific<br />

circumstances, these could not have been attended to at that<br />

particular time.<br />

In conclusion, one could say that the team leader is the most<br />

important person in a curriculum development team. The leader<br />

can make or break the process, as he or she gives direction,<br />

recognition for work done well, and supports the individual team<br />

members.<br />

On the other hand, the time aspect in any process can be critical, as<br />

stakeholders are normally people, who are continuing with the<br />

normal daily activities while taking on new tasks, and it is therefore<br />

imperative that this aspect be considered well in any development<br />

process. If people are under pressure to produce a product, that<br />

has to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> various institutions and people, and feel<br />

the pressure <strong>of</strong> work, feelings <strong>of</strong> anger and resentment could<br />

develop quite easily. On a positive note though, Successful<br />

communication could lead to feelings <strong>of</strong> satisfaction amongst the<br />

stakeholders. “I thought the person who I was liasing with and who<br />

was sending messages and so on, I though was well organized. The<br />

timeframes were set by the time I got there. There was enough<br />

time to read documents, but not too long that you would have lost<br />

it before you went back” (Participant 6: 53-59). This demonstrates<br />

the advantages <strong>of</strong> maintaining good time frames and good<br />

communication processes for any process, and must be recognised<br />

by the team leader as well.<br />

- 467 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!