10.12.2012 Views

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> & <strong>Midwifery</strong>, <strong>Trinity</strong> College Dublin: 8 th Annual Interdisciplinary Research <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Transforming Healthcare Through Research, Education & Technology: 7 th – 9 th November 2007<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Having had many consultations with all the participants in this study<br />

on several occasions throughout their treatment, a purposive<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> ten patients was selected. As one <strong>of</strong> the secondary<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> this study was to get a greater understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

patients’ experience <strong>of</strong> completing DDCs, interviewing patients in<br />

the control group was not considered. Therefore, a sample was<br />

chosen from the main intervention group who had completed DDCs<br />

and included two male patients, aged 68 and 70, and eight female<br />

patients, aged between 60 and 74. Six patients had completed<br />

treatment for colorectal cancer (two male and four female) and four<br />

had completed treatment for breast cancer (See table 1). These<br />

patients were chosen as they represented both genders as well as<br />

both cancer sites and would give a range <strong>of</strong> opinions that would<br />

provide rich data. Although five males were approached to take part<br />

in the interviews, only two <strong>of</strong> them agreed. The other three were<br />

happy to be interviewed but did not want to be taped; therefore<br />

they were excluded from the interviews. All patients were<br />

interviewed for approximately thirty minutes and each interview<br />

was taped.<br />

Table 1 - Number <strong>of</strong> patients interviewed about their Diary<br />

Cards:<br />

10 patients total Male Female<br />

Colorectal cancer 2 4<br />

Breast cancer 0 4<br />

Data collection<br />

Having selected a purposive sample <strong>of</strong> patients to be interviewed,<br />

they were approached and invited to take part in a semi-structured<br />

interview. Following an explanation <strong>of</strong> the procedure, written<br />

consent was obtained from those willing to take part. The DDCs<br />

were used as the basis for questions and prompts but there was<br />

flexibility in terms <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> the topics being considered during<br />

the interviews. This allowed the participants to develop ideas and<br />

speak more widely on the issues raised in the DDCs. Notes were<br />

also taken during the interview even though it was taped. This<br />

allowed comparison <strong>of</strong> the notes with the transcripts. It was also a<br />

useful safe pro<strong>of</strong> mechanism in case <strong>of</strong> a taping problem. The<br />

interviews lasted approximately thirty minutes and were taped so<br />

that analysis <strong>of</strong> the whole interview could be achieved.<br />

Data analysis<br />

The data was transcribed on to A4 sheets in a way that allowed<br />

notes and comments to be added on the right hand margin. Other<br />

data such as field notes and comments from the diary cards was<br />

also transcribed onto A4 sheets. Having transcribed the audiorecording<br />

and having made some checks on the validity <strong>of</strong> the data<br />

- 194 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!