10.12.2012 Views

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> & <strong>Midwifery</strong>, <strong>Trinity</strong> College Dublin: 8 th Annual Interdisciplinary Research <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Transforming Healthcare Through Research, Education & Technology: 7 th – 9 th November 2007<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

philosophy <strong>of</strong> holistic nursing into their life and practice. The initial<br />

criteria for inclusion in this study were being a certified holistic<br />

nurse and the time frame <strong>of</strong> the practicing HNC. With analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

eight volunteer participants’ interviews, theoretical saturation was<br />

evident. To confirm saturation, two additional volunteers were<br />

interviewed.<br />

Research Questions<br />

The inquiry for this study was driven by four central<br />

questions: (1) What motivates a pr<strong>of</strong>essional registered nurse to<br />

become an HNC? (2) What knowledge, skills and attitudes do<br />

experienced HNCs perceive they needed in order to become<br />

competent as holistic nurse practitioners? (3) How did those<br />

practitioners acquire the knowledge, skills and attitudes they<br />

perceived they needed? and (4) What factors facilitated and/or<br />

impeded their ability to become competent practitioners?<br />

Participants<br />

The participants in this study were primarily Caucasian (10%<br />

Asian), female, age range <strong>of</strong> 40-54 (mean 51.6 years). Highest<br />

degree obtained by a majority <strong>of</strong> the participants was a<br />

baccalaureate degree (50%), MSN (30%) and doctoral degree<br />

(20%). The mean number <strong>of</strong> years in nursing was 26.7, and range<br />

<strong>of</strong> years as an HNC was 3-5.8.<br />

An analysis <strong>of</strong> the demographic inventory indicated that the<br />

participants were representative <strong>of</strong> the AHNA’s membership, as well<br />

as representative <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional registered nurses’ who hold<br />

certification in a specialty area. In addition to the interview and<br />

CIT, a summative focus group was also utilized for triangulation to<br />

validate conclusions.<br />

Critical Incident Technique<br />

A critical incident was used to obtain a real life experience<br />

that pertained to research questions # 3 and # 4. After 8 <strong>of</strong> the 10<br />

participants completed the original critical incident and analyses <strong>of</strong><br />

those 8 critical incidents were completed, a more precise and brief<br />

critical incident was developed. The initial CIT utilized in this study<br />

was rather long and arduous, following more <strong>of</strong> Brookfield and<br />

Cranton’s version <strong>of</strong> including questions <strong>of</strong> when, how and who (see<br />

Table 1). The researcher realized that the data gleaned was not<br />

detailed enough and provided non-essential data to the research<br />

questions. The revised critical incident instrument was more to the<br />

point <strong>of</strong> the general aim <strong>of</strong> the study, it was succinct and brief (see<br />

Table 2). This CIT provided a crisp story <strong>of</strong> participants’ experience<br />

and reflection upon that event. The decision to develop a new CIT<br />

was based on the researchers’ interpretation that the initial data<br />

gleaned was not sufficient for triangulation and this was agreed<br />

- 689 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!