10.12.2012 Views

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> & <strong>Midwifery</strong>, <strong>Trinity</strong> College Dublin: 8 th Annual Interdisciplinary Research <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Transforming Healthcare Through Research, Education & Technology: 7 th – 9 th November 2007<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Action Research Cycles<br />

This collaborate study used both action research and critical<br />

ethnography to explore the nurses’ understanding and<br />

demonstration <strong>of</strong> critical thinking, in clinical practice. Action<br />

research involves group participation in setting the agenda, data<br />

collection, analysis and distribution <strong>of</strong> the findings. Each cycle<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> planning a change or improvement, acting, observing<br />

the process, reflecting and re-planning. Critical ethnography<br />

addresses the culture and the distribution <strong>of</strong> power. These two<br />

approaches were combined and interchanged throughout the study.<br />

Ethical approval was sought for the study prior to commencement.<br />

The first cycle consisted <strong>of</strong> ten participants with experience from<br />

three to twenty years, in paediatric critical care nursing. Two focus<br />

groups were held to assess the nurses understanding <strong>of</strong> critical<br />

thinking. The next cycle involved the activity <strong>of</strong> observing the<br />

demonstration <strong>of</strong> CT skills in practice. This cycle included ten<br />

sessions with five participants lasting four hours in the clinical<br />

environment. The third cycle evaluated the previous two cycles and<br />

concentrated on the feelings and experience <strong>of</strong> these five<br />

participants, through individual interviews.<br />

Each cycle in action research is revised on completion, with<br />

collaboration and reflexivity among the participants and the<br />

researcher, prior to moving onto the next stage. Throughout the<br />

process, continuous consent and approval was sought from the<br />

participants. The researcher is indebted to the participants, as<br />

without their kindness and enthusiasm the research process would<br />

be impossible.<br />

Results<br />

It evolved that most <strong>of</strong> the participants had a good understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> the term. They realised critical thinking occurs within everyday<br />

practice in the PICU, but they found it hard to put the words into<br />

context. The participants linked CT to the nursing process with<br />

step-by-step nursing activities. These processes are similar but not<br />

identical, as CT is used outside the nursing process and in situations<br />

where by there is no problem to solve (Wilkinson 1996).<br />

Unfortunately, discussions on reflection lead to negative<br />

connotations. The objective is to reflect and learn from an<br />

experience or event and to use this expertise in action.<br />

I discovered the participants practised critical thinking at a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>icient level and demonstrated these skills, in a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

situations. Moreover, the participants were <strong>of</strong>ten unaware <strong>of</strong> their<br />

reflective and cognitive abilities. In cycle three, the researcher used<br />

vignettes as a brief synopsis to describe their analytical practise.<br />

- 552 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!