10.12.2012 Views

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> & <strong>Midwifery</strong>, <strong>Trinity</strong> College Dublin: 8 th Annual Interdisciplinary Research <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Transforming Healthcare Through Research, Education & Technology: 7 th – 9 th November 2007<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

The study design was quantitative research applying ANNOVA. The<br />

setting was a Diabetes Center, in southern Maine. The sample<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> 51 women (with either pre-existing type 1 diabetes or<br />

type 2 diabetes).Women was informed at their first <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

appointment <strong>of</strong> the FDA status regarding Glargine insulin in<br />

pregnancy. They were <strong>of</strong>fered the option <strong>of</strong> staying on the analog or<br />

switching to a conventional therapy using NPH insulin. Notations<br />

were made in the charts recording the woman’s understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

both therapies. Data were collected from clinical visits and hospital<br />

records.<br />

Women in both groups were equally educated in SMBG and target<br />

ranges, meal planning (carbohydrate counting), exercise regimens<br />

(unless restricted by their OB provider) and stress reduction. They<br />

were expected to keep logs for glucose levels and food diaries.<br />

The study findings concluded that HbA1c values for women on<br />

Glargine insulin equaled 6.42% while the women on conventional<br />

therapy (NPH) equaled 7.15%. Hypoglycemic events defined by a<br />

finger stick <strong>of</strong> less then 60mg/dl, was noted at 29% for the Glargine<br />

insulin group versus 30% for the conventional therapy (NPH). The<br />

causes for hypoglycemia were similar in both groups ( over<br />

compensation for elevated values, miscalculation <strong>of</strong> carbohydrates,<br />

and hyperemesis). Perinatal complications included fewer SAB, lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> retinal changes and PTL in the Glargine insulin group. PIH was<br />

similar in both groups. In the Glragine group, 89% delivered at<br />

term gestation with less NICU interaction while in the conventional<br />

group 50% delivered at term with longer NICU stays.<br />

The findings <strong>of</strong> this limited case study concluded that women on the<br />

Glargine regimen had as good as, if not better glycemic control than<br />

the conventional therapy (NPH). Hypoglycemic episodes were<br />

similar however none needing EMT assistance in the Glargine insulin<br />

group. Perinatal complications were less regarding retinopathy and<br />

pre-term delivery and there were fewer incidences <strong>of</strong> neonatal<br />

complications in the Glargine insulin group.<br />

It is therefore recommended, that ongoing clinical trials are needed<br />

to define the efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> Glargine insulin in pregnancy as<br />

well as the continued assessment <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> these women<br />

for developmental issues during the first 5 years <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

Back to contents page<br />

- 412 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!