10.12.2012 Views

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> & <strong>Midwifery</strong>, <strong>Trinity</strong> College Dublin: 8 th Annual Interdisciplinary Research <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Transforming Healthcare Through Research, Education & Technology: 7 th – 9 th November 2007<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

The CDC reported no instances <strong>of</strong> H.I.V. being transmitted as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> Haemodialysis procedures (CDC 2001)<br />

Therefore, the reviewer focused on the transmission <strong>of</strong> Hepatitis C,<br />

as transmission is not uncommon, and considerable debate still<br />

exists on the best mechanisms for prevention.<br />

Three main issues emerged from the literature.<br />

1) A number <strong>of</strong> authors consider haemodialysis machines to be a<br />

potential source <strong>of</strong> infection. (Delarocque-Astagneau 2002,<br />

Sartor et al 2004, Savey et al 2005). As a result, some authors<br />

suggest that the CDC guidelines for Hepatitis C management in<br />

insufficient.<br />

Saxena et al (2003) isolated patients, staff and haemodialysis<br />

machines (the normal protocol for Hep B management) in an<br />

effort to reduce seroconversion rates.<br />

Shamshiraz (2004) examined isolated versus non isolated<br />

haemodialysis machines, with improved results for those on<br />

isolated machines. However, a dichotomy exists within the<br />

literature around this very point i.e isolation versus non-isolation.<br />

Ireland’s recently published guidelines recommend the isolation<br />

<strong>of</strong> machines for HBV, HCV and HIV (DoHC 2005), however some<br />

contend that strict adherence to good infection control practice is<br />

adequate (Jadoul et al 1998, Petrosillo et al 2001).<br />

2) A number <strong>of</strong> factors are statistically significant or statistically<br />

associated with Hepatitis C transmission in haemodialysis.<br />

Holiday dialysis (where a patient receives a treatment, or a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> treatments in a different dialysis unit) had a statistical<br />

association with HCV seroconversion (Schneeberger et al 2000,<br />

Carneiro et al 2005). The use <strong>of</strong> multi-dose drug vials has been<br />

identified as a possible source <strong>of</strong> transmission in multiple<br />

instances (Covic et al 1999, Krause et al 2003, Furusyo et al<br />

2004).<br />

Staff patient ratios and staff experience (Petrosillo et al 2000,<br />

Saxena & Panhotra 2004) and the prevalence <strong>of</strong> HCV (Pujol et al<br />

1996, Petrosillo et al 2000, Fissell et al 2004) have both been<br />

identified as statistically significant.<br />

The only factor repeatedly found to be an independent risk factor<br />

for HCV is length <strong>of</strong> time on haemodialysis. It has been<br />

suggested that even minor breaches in infection control,<br />

multiplied over time, present the single largest risk to patients.<br />

(Huang et al 1993, Sivapalasingam et al 2002, Hinrichsen et al<br />

2002)<br />

- 663 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!