10.12.2012 Views

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> & <strong>Midwifery</strong>, <strong>Trinity</strong> College Dublin: 8 th Annual Interdisciplinary Research <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Transforming Healthcare Through Research, Education & Technology: 7 th – 9 th November 2007<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Methodology<br />

The study employed a comparative descriptive survey methodology.<br />

Using a sample size calculator set at 5% level <strong>of</strong> error and 95%<br />

level <strong>of</strong> confidence, a sample size <strong>of</strong> 150 nurses was randomly<br />

drawn from a population <strong>of</strong> 250. The population for the study from<br />

which the sample was drawn consisted <strong>of</strong> all Registered Nurses<br />

working in acute clinical areas. The sample included full-time and<br />

part-time Registered Nurses employed on a permanent basis in the<br />

three acute hospitals in one health board, the formerly known<br />

Midland Health Board region (HSE Dublin/Mid-Leinster). Clinical<br />

Nurse Managers 1 and 2 were included as their roles involve<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> clinical practice in addition to their management roles<br />

and to enable the exploration <strong>of</strong> relationships between the different<br />

grades <strong>of</strong> nurses and their attitudes towards role extension and<br />

expansion. Registered nurses employed on a temporary basis or by<br />

agencies were excluded due to the variability in their clinical areas<br />

<strong>of</strong> practice.<br />

Permission to conduct the research was obtained and granted from<br />

the Directors <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> <strong>of</strong> all three sites. Consent from nurses to<br />

participate in the study was by virtue <strong>of</strong> completion and return <strong>of</strong><br />

the questionnaire. The right to privacy was observed through<br />

anonymity and confidentiality <strong>of</strong> participants <strong>of</strong> the study.<br />

The constructs or variables that were observed and measured in the<br />

proposed study were nurses’ attitudes, the Scope <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Practice, role extension and role expansion. The study employed a<br />

questionnaire developed by Magennis et al (1999) for a dissertation<br />

on “the attitudes <strong>of</strong> practicing nurses to role expansion and role<br />

extension.” Permission to replicate the study was obtained and<br />

granted by the supervisor <strong>of</strong> the dissertation, Dr. Slevin.<br />

The questionnaire contained thirty items. The first section consisted<br />

<strong>of</strong> five dichotomous ‘yes’ or ‘no’ questions developed to identify<br />

attitudes towards the Scope <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practice. The second<br />

section consisted <strong>of</strong> ten items with degrees <strong>of</strong> agreement or<br />

disagreement on role extension followed by third section with eight<br />

items related to attitudes towards the expanded role. The final<br />

section <strong>of</strong> the questionnaire consisted <strong>of</strong> seven question on<br />

biographic data.<br />

Data were collected using a self-administered survey questionnaire<br />

distributed by post. From a total <strong>of</strong> 150 posted, 88 completed<br />

questionnaires were returned giving an overall response rate <strong>of</strong><br />

58.7%. The low response rate, even though common, is slightly<br />

below the recommended 60%, resulting in a high risk <strong>of</strong> response<br />

bias (Polit and Hungler 1999).<br />

- 521 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!