10.12.2012 Views

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

Conference Proceedings - School of Nursing & Midwifery - Trinity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong> & <strong>Midwifery</strong>, <strong>Trinity</strong> College Dublin: 8 th Annual Interdisciplinary Research <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Transforming Healthcare Through Research, Education & Technology: 7 th – 9 th November 2007<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

were made on the items in the questionnaire especially that some<br />

questions were repeated in a slightly different form in different<br />

sections <strong>of</strong> the questionnaire. This discussion demonstrated that<br />

respondents had a high level <strong>of</strong> attention to, and engagement with,<br />

the research process.<br />

The focus group took place during class time scheduled for a<br />

sociology lecture and eight students (male=3, female=5) were<br />

available for participation. Respondents were made cognizant <strong>of</strong><br />

the consent form and ethical issues relating to confidentiality issues<br />

were agreed upon by participants and researchers in an effort to<br />

conform to best practice regarding the issue <strong>of</strong> informed consent.<br />

Subjects were once again informed that participation was voluntary<br />

and that no penalties would accrue if they wished to withdraw at<br />

this stage. Respondents were then informed <strong>of</strong> the areas that were<br />

going to be discussed, assured that all responses were confidential<br />

and that they were free to leave, or not to answer questions, at<br />

anytime. The first author acted as facilitator while the second<br />

author acted as note taker.<br />

Ethical consideration<br />

An extensive discussion occurred prior to both administration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

questionnaire and running the focus group. Issues discussed<br />

included the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the researchers to ensure the<br />

anonymity <strong>of</strong> the respondents. In particular respondents were<br />

assured that no-one would be identifiable from the information<br />

given on the questionnaire. Respondents were told that in<br />

quantitative type <strong>of</strong> surveys it was the aggregate <strong>of</strong> their responses,<br />

which was <strong>of</strong> interest to the researchers. The study was carried out<br />

with the full consent <strong>of</strong> respondents who understood that they could<br />

refuse to take part and could withdraw at any time. For the focus<br />

group research, respondents were told that the tapes and notes<br />

would be held in a secure place and that there would be no way <strong>of</strong><br />

identifying any individual response from this material. They were<br />

assured that only the researchers would have access to the material<br />

and that no individual would be identifiable from their responses.<br />

They were asked not to discuss anything that occurred during the<br />

session with outsiders and that they should not repeat outside the<br />

group information that could identity participants. They were then<br />

given a consent form, which the researchers reviewed with them<br />

prior to tape-recording the session. After ensuring that respondents<br />

understood the nature <strong>of</strong> the task they were involved in they were<br />

then asked to sign the consent form.<br />

Data analysis<br />

Responses were imputed and analysed using SPSS (v13.5) while<br />

the notes from the focus group were transcribed and analysed for<br />

- 591 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!