23.09.2013 Views

sou 1999 1 - Regeringen

sou 1999 1 - Regeringen

sou 1999 1 - Regeringen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOU <strong>1999</strong>:1 Summary 31<br />

Certain financial information<br />

In conjunction with bankruptcies, the largest amount of claims relates to<br />

creditors without rights of priority. The amount of their claims equal the<br />

amount of all other creditors. Claims by creditors (usually banks) whose<br />

claims are secured by business mortgage constitute an amount more than<br />

half the size of claims of creditors without rights of priority. Thereafter, the<br />

State’s tax claims constitute an amount half the size of claims secured by<br />

business mortgages. Wage claims, in their turn, constitute an amount approximately<br />

half the size of tax claims.<br />

On average, floating charges provide a dividend of approximately 45% of<br />

the amount of the claim. Tax and wage claims usually yield approximately<br />

10%, while on average creditors without right of priority receive only 3%. It<br />

is, however, difficult to talk in terms of averages in this context. Thus, the<br />

median dividend on wage claims is 0%, from which it is evident that, for the<br />

employees, wage guarantees are more important than rights of priority for<br />

wage claims.<br />

The tasks of the Right of Priority Committee<br />

The rules with respect to composition were previously set forth in an Act<br />

from 1970 (no. 847). This entailed, primarily, that individual execution<br />

measures were prohibited during the period of time in which composition<br />

negotiations were pending and that, following a qualified majority vote, the<br />

claims of creditors without rights of priority could be reduced, normally to a<br />

minimum of 25%.<br />

In 1992, a committee designated as the Insolvency Committee presented a<br />

proposal (SOU 1992:113) for a Business Reorganisation Act which was<br />

intended to replace the Composition Act and, hopefully, increase the number<br />

of compositions. In fact, Sweden has had only approximately 50 judicial<br />

compositions per year, while there are approximately 9,000 bankruptcies.<br />

Following prolonged consideration by the Ministry of Justice, the new Act<br />

was enacted in 1996 (no. 764). The changes were not great. Where possible,<br />

company reorganisations should be brought forward and can now be initiated<br />

as soon as payment difficulties arise, even though there is not necessarily<br />

a situation of insolvency. During the attempted reorganisation, financing<br />

is facilitated by a new right of priority for loans to the debtor under<br />

reorganisation (section 10 of the Right of Priority Act). The debtor under<br />

reorganisation should also more easily be able to retain advantageous contracts.<br />

In Chapter 2, section 20 of the Business Reorganisation Act, a rule<br />

has been introduced whereby, following the initiation of a reorganisation,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!