evaluacija reforme obrazovanja u crnoj gori - Zavod za školstvo

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Miloš Bešić, Tomislav Reškovac − Vesna Pavićević, profesorica jezika i književnosti u gimnaziji u Baru − Džoana Perkaj, savjetnica za istoriju u Zavodu za školstvo Crne Gore − mr Blaženka Petričević, savjetnica za biologiju u Zavodu za školstvo − Marija Petranić, psiholog, saradnik na Filozofskom fakultetu − Gordana Vučinić, profesorica jugoslovenske i opšte književnosti, u gimnaziji „Slobodan Škerović”u Podgorici − doc. dr Tatjana Novović, profesorica pedagoške grupe predmeta na Filozofskom fakultetu − Tamara Čirgić, Forum MNE u Podgorici − mr Danilo Leković, Filozofski fakultet − Marko Dragaš, profesor engleskoj jezika, saradnik u PCMNE Autorima istraživanja o inkluziji: • Prof. dr Saša Milić • doc. dr Biljana Maslovarić Autorkama istraživanja o učešću učenika/učenica: • Dragana Papić, Forum MNE • Dijana Vučković, Filozofski fakultet Nikšić • Olivera Leković, OŠ „Pavle Rovinski“ • Milosava Mrdak, srednja stručna škola „Sergije Stanić“ • Vanja Rakočević, gimnazija „Slobodan Škerović“ Autorkama istraživanja o učešću roditelja: • Nada Bukilić • Jelena Begović • Ljilja Milonjić • Tamara Čirgić Koordinacionom timu za istraživanje o učešću roditelja: • Zorica Minić, Ispitni centar • Marijana Papić, dir. OŠ „Pavle Rovinski“ 264
Page 1 and 2:
EVALUACIJA REFORME OBRAZOVANJA U CR
Page 3 and 4:
Miloš Bešić, Tomislav Reškovac
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
NUMERACIJA PROCES/AKTIVNOST INDIKAT
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Fig 10. Kritičko mišljenje: Gimna
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Fig 18. Timski rad: Gimnazija - % D
Page 53 and 54:
Fig. 23. Postoji jasna podjela zada
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Fig. 61. Nastavni program je nepril
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Fig. 109: Ocjena: kabinet za muzič
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
2.13 GENERALNI STAVOVI O REFORMI OB
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Kada su u pitanju institucije koje
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Jedna od učesnica je ipak reagoval
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
8. EVALUACIJA KVALITETA INDIVIDUALN
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214: Miloš Bešić, Tomislav Reškovac
Page 231 and 232: PARTICIPACIJA RODITELJA U ŽIVOTU
Page 263: Miloš Bešić, Tomislav Reškovac
show all

evaluacija reforme obrazovanja u crnoj gori - Zavod za školstvo

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?