RATL: A Database of Reptile and Amphibian Toxicology Literature

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Contaminant a Species Code b Lifestage c Location Collectio n Date Other Residues d Table 1- Field Residues - 37 Egg e Whole Body e Viscera e Fat e Muscle e Liver e Kidney e Reference k DDT EMBL tadpole OH, USA 1963 4.8-5.8 ppm Meeks 1968 DDT GRGE various ON, CAN < 1975 (egg, hatchling, liver and/or muscle; see paper); 0.01- 0.05 Campbell 1975 DDT KIFL adult TX, USA 1968-71 1.2 Flickinger and King 1972 DDT LAGE adult TX, USA 1974-75 14.6 Fleet and Plapp DDE/ DDT ratio= 41 1978 DDT LAGE adult TX, USA 1971 Navasota area: 0.5- 0.8 Fleet et al. 1972 DDT LEKE adult NC, USA 1991-92 subcutaneous fat=< 2- 5.19 µg/kg < 2 µg/kg Rybitski et al. 1995 DDT LEKE juvenile NY, USA 1980-89 Range of Range of Lake et al. 1994 Means= Means= 10.3-14.1 ND-11.1 DDT LIOL egg Australia 1970-71 0.13-39.8 Best 1973 DDT LIPG adult India 1991 0.52-1.4 ng/g ww Ramesh et al. 1992 DDT LITA adult Australia 1972 DDE = 0.1 mg/kg ww DDT plus Birks and Olsen metabolites = 0.1 mg/kg ww 1987 DDT LITA juvenile Australia 1972 DDE = 0.5 mg/kg ww DDT plus Birks and Olsen metabolites = 0.5 mg/kg ww 1987 DDT MAQ adult Zimbabwe 1989-90 no DDT Lambert 1994b U treatment s=0.31 ppm lipid, one or more treatment s=1.22 ppm DDT MAST adult Zimbabwe 1989-90 Total DDT rose significantly with up to 263 Lambert 1993 treatments µg/g lipid (7 µg/g ww bw) after 3-6 yrs
Contaminant a Species Code b Lifestage c Location Collectio n Date Other Residues d DDT MAST adult Zimbabwe 1989-90 63% of total DDT was DDE in lizards from unsprayed areas and 56 % of DDT in lizards from sprayed areas Table 1- Field Residues - 38 Egg e Whole Body e Viscera e Fat e total DDT ranged from 1.32- 25.44 ppm lipid Muscle e Liver e Kidney e Reference k Lambert 1994b DDT MOBO adult Australia 1972 DDE = 0.1 mg/kg ww DDT plus Birks and Olsen metabolites = 0.1 mg/kg ww 1987 DDT MOSV egg Australia 1970-71 ND Best 1973 DDT NASI tadpole OH, USA 1963 Range= 1.4-36.4 0.4-5.3 Range= Meeks 1968 ND-0.9 ND-7.3 DDT NECY adult LA, USA 1977-79 ND-0.04 ppm Sabourin et al. 1984 DDT NECY embryo LA, USA 1977-79 0.07 ppm Sabourin et al. 1984 DDT NEER adult TX, USA 1974-75 2.8 Fleet and Plapp DDE/ DDT ratio= 63 1978 DDT NEER adult TX, USA 1971 Navasota area: 0.1- 0.8 Brazos area: 8.5- 37.9 Fleet et al. 1972 DDT NEER adult TX, USA 1968-71 0.3 Flickinger and King 1972 DDT NEFA adult TX, USA 1974-75 7.0 DDE/ Fleet and Plapp DDT ratio= 29 1978 DDT NEFA adult TX, USA 1968-71 3.9 Flickinger and King 1972 DDT NELE adult NC, USA < 1985 DDT= ND; DDE= 0.06; DDD= 0.04 Hall et al. 1985 k DDT NEMA adult ON, CAN 1988, 90 pooled was 0.5- 8.3 ng/g ww Bonin et al. 1995 DDT NEMA adult ON, CAN 1992-93 gonad: Range of Means= ND- 0.17 ppm Gendron et al. 1997
Page 1 and 2: RATL: A Database of Reptile and Amp
Page 3 and 4: RATL: A Database of Reptile and Amp
Page 5 and 6: ABSTRACT Many amphibian and reptile
Page 7 and 8: PRÉFACE De nombreuses populations
Page 9 and 10: TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract………
Page 11 and 12: LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Contaminant
Page 13 and 14: INTRODUCTION Why is there a need fo
Page 15 and 16: Limitations of RATL The RATL databa
Page 17 and 18: Contaminant a Species Code b Lifest
Page 35 and 36: Table 1- Field Residues - 20 Contam
Page 51: Contaminant a Species Code b Lifest
Page 69 and 70: Table 1- Field Residues - 54 Contam
Page 103 and 104:
Table 1- Field Residues - 88 Contam
Page 105 and 106:
Contaminant a Species Code b Lifest
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Table 2 - Field Studies - 2 Contami
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Table 2 - Field Studies - 12 Contam
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Table 3: Acute toxicity values from
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Contaminant a Species Code b azinph
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Contaminant a Species Code b tar XE
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Table 4: Laboratory studies not inc
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Contaminant a Species Code b Cd AMG
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Table 5: FETAX data. [FETAX (Frog E
Page 257 and 258:
Table 5 - FETAX Studies - 3 Contami
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Contaminant a Contaminant b Concent
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Table 5 - FETAX Studies - 11 Contam
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Table 6: pH study data. (Studies th
Page 279 and 280:
Table 6 - pH Studies - 3 Species Co
Page 281 and 282:
Species Code b Lifestage Study Endp
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Table 6 - pH Studies - 13 Species C
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Table 7: Reviews of primary literat
Page 319 and 320:
Table 7 - Reviews - 3 Review Title
Page 321 and 322:
Table 8 - Population Status - 2 Pop
Page 323 and 324:
Table Notes Note a : see Appendix 2
Page 325 and 326:
References - 2 Anderson, L.M. and R
Page 327 and 328:
References - 4 Bantle, J.A., D.J. F
Page 329 and 330:
References - 6 Beresford, W.A. , M.
Page 331 and 332:
References - 8 Bishop, C.A, P. Ng,
Page 333 and 334:
References - 10 Bragg, A.N. 1964. M
Page 335 and 336:
References - 12 Burke, E.M. and F.H
Page 337 and 338:
References - 14 Chattopadhyay, D.P.
Page 339 and 340:
References - 16 Cooke, A.S. 1974. T
Page 341 and 342:
References - 18 Dash, M.C. and A.K.
Page 343 and 344:
References - 20 DeWitt, J.B., D.G.
Page 345 and 346:
References - 22 Dutta, S.K. and P.
Page 347 and 348:
References - 24 Elisyeyeva, K.H., H
Page 349 and 350:
References - 26 Fontenot, L., C. Ro
Page 351 and 352:
References - 28 Frisbie, M.P. and R
Page 353 and 354:
References - 30 Godet, F., M. Babut
Page 355 and 356:
References - 32 Gunther, R. and J.
Page 357 and 358:
References - 34 Harfenist, A., T. P
Page 359 and 360:
References - 36 Herkovits, J. and C
Page 361 and 362:
References - 38 Hota, A. K. and M.C
Page 363 and 364:
References - 40 Johnson, C.R. 1972a
Page 365 and 366:
References - 42 Karns, D.R. 1984. T
Page 367 and 368:
References - 44 Kraskowski, H.V., K
Page 369 and 370:
References - 46 Leblanc, G.A. and L
Page 371 and 372:
References - 48 Lotshaw, D.P. 1977.
Page 373 and 374:
References - 50 Massot, M., J. Clob
Page 375 and 376:
References - 52 Mendonca, M., J. Sh
Page 377 and 378:
References - 54 Munro, D.F. 1949. E
Page 379 and 380:
References - 56 Oliveira, E.M., D.V
Page 381 and 382:
References - 58 Paulov, S. 1977b. T
Page 383 and 384:
References - 60 Pierce, M.E. 1958.
Page 385 and 386:
References - 62 Raj, T.P., A. Jeban
Page 387 and 388:
References - 64 Rolfe, G. L., A. Ha
Page 389 and 390:
References - 66 Sassaman, J.F. 1978
Page 391 and 392:
References - 68 Semlitsch, R.D. and
Page 393 and 394:
References - 70 Sparling, D.W., T.P
Page 395 and 396:
References - 72 Surova, G.S. and A.
Page 397 and 398:
References - 74 Tomar, V. and A. K.
Page 399 and 400:
References - 76 Vijverberg, H.P.M.,
Page 401 and 402:
References - 78 White, D.H. and A.J
Page 403 and 404:
References - 80 Wyman, R.L. and J.
Page 405 and 406:
Appendix 1a: Species codes in alpha
Page 407 and 408:
Appendix 1a - Species Codes - 3 Cla
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Appendix 1a - Species Codes - 11 Cl
Page 417 and 418:
Appendix 1a - Species Codes - 13 Cl
Page 419 and 420:
Appendix 1b - Species Common Names
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Appendix 1c - Species Scientific Na
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Appendix 2a: Contaminant codes foun
Page 447 and 448:
Appendix 2a - Contaminant Codes - 3
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Appendix 2b: Contaminants sorted by
Page 469 and 470:
Appendix 2b - Contaminant Type - 3
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Appendix 4: Descriptions of exposur
Page 489 and 490:
Appendix 6a: Glossary of Abbreviati
Page 491 and 492:
Appendix 6b: Relevant biological an
Page 493 and 494:
Appendix 6b - Glossary of RATL term
show all

RATL: A Database of Reptile and Amphibian Toxicology Literature

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?