22.11.2012 Views

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ijcrb.webs.com<br />

INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS<br />

COPY RIGHT © 2011 Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Interdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>Research</strong> 103<br />

JANUARY 2011<br />

VOL 2, NO 9<br />

table 4 show that customer satisfaction is predicted by service dimension. From the<br />

multiple regression analysis <strong>in</strong> table 4, F value, when customer satisfaction was regressed<br />

with customer dimension was 12.889, F (10/410 = 12.889, P = 0.05). The regression is a<br />

significant explanation <strong>of</strong> the variation <strong>in</strong> the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> customers <strong>of</strong> state Mass<br />

Transit corporations s<strong>in</strong>ce 12.889 is higher than critical value <strong>of</strong> F = 1.83 at 0.05 alpha<br />

level. The coefficient <strong>of</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ation was 24.40%.<br />

The coefficients <strong>of</strong> the model are shown <strong>in</strong> table 5.<br />

Table 5: Coefficient (Customers)<br />

Model 1 Unstandardised Standardised T Sig R<br />

Coefficient<br />

Coefficient<br />

2<br />

B Std Error Beta<br />

Constant 0.00528 0.43 0.122 0.903<br />

2<br />

Comfort 0.200 0.43 0.201 4.621 .000 0.040<br />

Timel<strong>in</strong>ess 0.07977 0.43 0.080 1.844 0.066 0.066<br />

Safety 0.334 0.43 0.335 7.714 .000 0.112<br />

Attitude<br />

Drivers<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.0680 0.43 -0.068 -1.572 0.117 0.005<br />

Transport Fare 0.09534 0.43 0.096 2.204 0.028 0.009<br />

Convenience -0.186 0.43 -0.187 -4.310 0.000 0.035<br />

Breakdown <strong>of</strong> -0.00766 0.43 -0.008 -01.77 0.860 0.0001<br />

Vehicles<br />

Affordability -0.0616 0.43 -0.062 -1.424 0.155 0.004<br />

Accessibility -0.162 0.43 -0.163 -3.752 0.200 0.0266<br />

Empathy -0.0696 0.43 -0.070 -1.609 0.100 0.0049<br />

Source: Author‟s Computation<br />

From Table 5, four factors were not significant, which were factor 4, factor 7,<br />

factor 8 and factor 10. Factor 3 was the attitude <strong>of</strong> drivers, factor 7 was breakdown <strong>of</strong><br />

vehicles, factor 8 was affordability <strong>of</strong> transport services and factor 10 was empathy <strong>of</strong><br />

customers towards the services <strong>of</strong> State Mass Transits Service.<br />

From table 5, factor 3 had the highest coefficient <strong>of</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ation which was<br />

11.20%, followed by factor 1 which had 4.00%, then factor 6, which had 3.50% and<br />

factor 9, which had 2.66%. Factor 3 was safety <strong>of</strong> services, factor 1 was comfortability,<br />

factor 6 was convenience <strong>of</strong> services and factor 9 was accessibility <strong>of</strong> services by<br />

customers. Other factors had less than 1% <strong>of</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />

5. Summary and Conclusions<br />

Commuter perception <strong>of</strong> transport service quality <strong>of</strong> state transit corporations depends on<br />

timel<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>of</strong> the service as revealed by the study and supported by multiple regression<br />

analysis revealed three major variables <strong>of</strong> safety and timelessness <strong>of</strong> state transport<br />

services – timely arrival at dest<strong>in</strong>ation, good driv<strong>in</strong>g habits <strong>of</strong> the drivers <strong>of</strong> state Mass<br />

Transit corporations and drivers not keep<strong>in</strong>g to time schedules. This is also supported by<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> factor 2 <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipal component analysis. The variables <strong>in</strong> factor 2 are;<br />

timely arrival for departure, timely arrival at dest<strong>in</strong>ation and time consciousness <strong>of</strong><br />

drivers.<br />

The variables revealed by study were <strong>of</strong> two categories – positive relationship and<br />

negative relationship. Timely arrival at dest<strong>in</strong>ation and good driv<strong>in</strong>g habits <strong>of</strong> drivers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!