22.11.2012 Views

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ijcrb.webs.com<br />

INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS<br />

Trust Models <strong>in</strong> e-Bus<strong>in</strong>ess; Analytical-Compare Approach<br />

JANURAY 2011<br />

VOL 2, NO 9<br />

Nour mohammad Yaghoubi<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Sistan and Baluchestan, School <strong>of</strong> management and account<strong>in</strong>g , Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Management, Zahedan, Iran<br />

Razieh Yekkeh khani<br />

Masters Student <strong>of</strong> IT Management, University <strong>of</strong> Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran<br />

Mohammad javad Esmaeali<br />

Masters Student <strong>of</strong> IT Management, University <strong>of</strong> Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran<br />

Abstract<br />

In recent decades, different Electronic Trust (e-trust) models have been <strong>in</strong>troduced. In this<br />

study, an attempt has been made to <strong>in</strong>troduce 10 e-trust models for e-commerce, e-bank<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

and e-government. These models have provided a basis for much research, as e-trust literature<br />

has demonstrated. The aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is survey on models <strong>of</strong> e-trust by analytical-compare<br />

analysis. We beg<strong>in</strong> by shortly <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g models <strong>of</strong> e-trust, then we discuss and expla<strong>in</strong><br />

About these models. In respect with the evolutionary nature <strong>of</strong> e-trust models, the aforesaid<br />

models have been compared to each other analytically based on different dimensions <strong>of</strong> Kim<br />

et al. (2005) e-trust model.<br />

Key Words: Electronic Trust, Trust Models, Trust dimensions.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Today, e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess is not only a choice, but also an <strong>in</strong>evitable pr<strong>in</strong>ciple for ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

competitive advantage on the part <strong>of</strong> organizations and <strong>in</strong>stitutions which operate <strong>in</strong> a<br />

dynamic environment. e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess has brought about an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the quality, dynamics, and<br />

speed <strong>of</strong> access to the customers and the market. By contrast, it has brought about a decrease<br />

<strong>in</strong> the prices, implementation time, and time duration <strong>of</strong> access to the market. Therefore, it is<br />

to note that to be pioneer <strong>in</strong> e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess is not an easy task at all (hosse<strong>in</strong>i et al., 1385, p.1).<br />

Trust is appeal<strong>in</strong>g to many. Why are many organizations and even many countries more<br />

efficient than others? Why do some countries have a stronger conviction about, a higher<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrity with, the social development than others? The answers lie <strong>in</strong> the relation <strong>of</strong> trust and<br />

development. There is a strong positive connection between understand<strong>in</strong>g the value <strong>of</strong> trust<br />

<strong>in</strong> a society and its economic growth. Public trust is not based on the previous co-operations,<br />

but on trust between strangers. They trust most people. Also, trust provides a basis for all sorts<br />

<strong>of</strong> new social and commercial relationships. New forms <strong>of</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess are created only based on<br />

trust between people and organizations (Grudzewski et al., 2008, p.17).<br />

Zand holds that the concept <strong>of</strong> trust is generally complex. A comprehensive def<strong>in</strong>ition would<br />

be: ―a tendency towards an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the people‘s vulnerability to the uncontrolable<br />

behaviour <strong>of</strong> some person, and an exploitation <strong>of</strong> such a vulnerability, <strong>of</strong> which the poteancial<br />

benefit is much less than the poteancial loss‖ (Zand, 1997, p.91). There is no general<br />

consensus over the def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> trust <strong>in</strong> the literature, both onl<strong>in</strong>e and <strong>of</strong>fl<strong>in</strong>e, on trust. It is so<br />

because the term is multidem<strong>in</strong>sional and difficult to def<strong>in</strong>e. This difficulty arises partly from<br />

the fact that we normally use different words to denote the same concept such as<br />

trustworth<strong>in</strong>ess and trust or trust<strong>in</strong>g and hav<strong>in</strong>g ensurance (akhaviZadgan, 2008, p. 66).<br />

Luhmann (1982) believes that such a lack <strong>of</strong> consensus over the concept <strong>of</strong> trust is because <strong>of</strong><br />

the fact that trust is an <strong>in</strong>tegral part <strong>of</strong> the human nature, and such a lack <strong>of</strong> consensus over it<br />

COPY RIGHT © 2011 Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Interdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>Research</strong> 398<br />

Listed <strong>in</strong> ULRICH’S

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!