22.11.2012 Views

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ijcrb.webs.com<br />

INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS<br />

which does not support to the previous f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs. This study had an important impact on<br />

researchers, and <strong>in</strong> some cases on organizations, with some managers and HR<br />

practitioners conclud<strong>in</strong>g that the relationship between job satisfaction and performance<br />

was trivial.<br />

In addition, <strong>in</strong> a comprehensive review <strong>of</strong> 301 studies, Judge, Thoresen, Bono, and Patton<br />

(2001) found that when the correlations are appropriately corrected (for sampl<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

measurement errors); the average correlation between job satisfaction and job<br />

performance is a higher 0.30. This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is supportive <strong>of</strong> current study sampl<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

measurement as results <strong>of</strong> job satisfaction and job performance (0.52) is a higher than<br />

0.30 Thus, contrary to earlier reviews, it does appear that job satisfaction is, <strong>in</strong> fact,<br />

predictive <strong>of</strong> job performance and the relationship is stronger.<br />

Previous work <strong>of</strong> Fried & Ferris (1987); Parisi & We<strong>in</strong>er (1999); and We<strong>in</strong>er (2000)<br />

envisaged that major job satisfaction areas <strong>in</strong>cludes, satisfaction with the nature <strong>of</strong> the job<br />

itself, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g job challenge, autonomy, skill variety and scope, best predicts overall job<br />

satisfaction, as well as other important outcomes like job retention. Correlation between<br />

job satisfaction and job retention <strong>in</strong> this study is (r = 0.34) which is statistically significant.<br />

Hence these f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g support the work <strong>of</strong> Fried and Ferris (1987); Parisi and We<strong>in</strong>er<br />

(1999); and We<strong>in</strong>er (2000).<br />

Job satisfaction, which shows organization‘s <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the compensation and career<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> the employee, has a direct <strong>in</strong>fluence on an employee‘s commitment to the<br />

organization, which <strong>in</strong> turn affects employee retention and employee productivity and<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ally results <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased job performance. This is <strong>in</strong> conformity with the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

Igbaria and Greenhaus (1992). S<strong>in</strong>ce most <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>essionals <strong>in</strong> the organizations were<br />

<strong>in</strong> their mid career, they look for career growth. More than pay, prime value is given to<br />

growth opportunities. If there is scope for career growth <strong>in</strong> the organization, employees<br />

feel attached to the organization and rema<strong>in</strong> longer and contribute towards organizational<br />

success. The <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> organizational commitment on employee retention and<br />

productivity is very much <strong>in</strong> consistency with previous studies (Becker, 1960; Allen &<br />

Meyer, 1996; Mowday et al., 1979). Organizations that are <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> a long-term<br />

relationship with employees reap the rewards <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial terms through <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

productivity and long term aff<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> the employee with the organization. It is really<br />

<strong>in</strong>spir<strong>in</strong>g to observe that expenditure on employees is not an overhead, but a long-term<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment for greater long-term returns.<br />

Although salary package is a major cost <strong>in</strong> the public sector regulatory authorities, good<br />

compensation packages have a direct positive impact on job satisfaction and job retention<br />

for highly qualified and tra<strong>in</strong>ed manpower to enhance the productivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organization. This is <strong>in</strong> agreement with the Harvard approach that all HRM practices<br />

should lead to cost effectiveness (Beer et al., 1984). This reveals that a well-designed<br />

compensation system can reduce operat<strong>in</strong>g costs. It might be through enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

commitment <strong>of</strong> employees to contribute more to the organization. Higher pay may not<br />

always <strong>in</strong>crease operat<strong>in</strong>g costs if it is used to enhance overall productivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organization. Many previous studies found compensation and rewards to be the major<br />

factor decid<strong>in</strong>g the organizational commitment <strong>of</strong> employees (Steers, 1977; Mowday et<br />

al., 1982; Angle, 1983; Mottaz, 1988). Compensation might be a major criterion for<br />

COPY RIGHT © 2011 Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Interdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>Research</strong> 175<br />

JANUARY 2011<br />

VOL 2, NO 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!