22.11.2012 Views

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ijcrb.webs.com<br />

INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS<br />

JANURAY 2011<br />

VOL 2, NO 9<br />

In early years, Pakistan was produc<strong>in</strong>g and export<strong>in</strong>g only primary products, ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

dependent on climatic conditions. In 1948-49, 99% <strong>of</strong> Pakistan‘s export earn<strong>in</strong>gs were made<br />

up <strong>of</strong> just five primary commodities: raw jute, raw cotton, raw wool, hides, and tea. A change<br />

began to occur as Pakistan‘s economic policies shifted towards an emphasis on<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrialization. By 1951-52, the five ma<strong>in</strong> primary commodities contributed 93% <strong>of</strong> export<br />

earn<strong>in</strong>gs, which by 1958-59 had fallen to 75%. Pakistan‘s composition <strong>of</strong> exports and imports<br />

has changed drastically. Primary commodities, which were 99% <strong>of</strong> exports <strong>in</strong> 1948-49, fell to<br />

45% <strong>in</strong> 1971-72, and were a mere 11% <strong>in</strong> 1994-95. Similarly, manufactured goods contribute<br />

as much as 89% <strong>of</strong> Pakistan‘s exports.<br />

The basic aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the role <strong>of</strong> the component <strong>of</strong> total exports<br />

(manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, semi manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and primary exports) <strong>in</strong> boost<strong>in</strong>g up economic growth<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g 1972 to 2005. The rest <strong>of</strong> the paper is organized as follows. The paper is organized as<br />

follows: section 2 reviews the relevant literature. Section 3 expla<strong>in</strong>s specification <strong>of</strong><br />

econometric model, variables and data sources for empirical analysis. Section 4 deals the<br />

methodological issues for longitud<strong>in</strong>al data. Section 5 reports the empirical results for short<br />

and long run equilibrium alongwith granger causality based on Toda and Yamamoto (1995)<br />

procedure. Last section concludes and suggests some policy recommendations based on<br />

empirical results.<br />

2. Literature Review<br />

Given the enormous literature on ELG, we limited literature review by referr<strong>in</strong>g some highly<br />

significant studies that provide a useful framework for the analysis <strong>of</strong> the ELG paradigm,<br />

followed by some studies carried out for Pakistan. Segerstrom et al. (1990), Grossman and<br />

Helpman (1990), Rivera-Batiz and Romer (1991) provide a useful framework for analyz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the relationship between exports and economic growth. These studies emphasized that exports<br />

enhance total factor productivity which <strong>in</strong>crease economies <strong>of</strong> scale, technology, workers and<br />

managerial skills, ability for utilization <strong>of</strong> resources as well as productive capacity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

economy.<br />

Exports promote thresholds effects due to economies <strong>of</strong> scale, <strong>in</strong>creased capacity utilization,<br />

productivity ga<strong>in</strong>s, and greater product variety (see Balassa, 1978 and 1985, Jung and<br />

Marshall, 1985, Ram, 1985 and 1987, Bahmani et al., 1991, Khalifa Al-Youssif, 1997, and<br />

Lev<strong>in</strong> and Raut, 1997). These studies analyzed the role <strong>of</strong> exports <strong>in</strong> the economic growth<br />

particularly for develop<strong>in</strong>g countries. Most <strong>of</strong> these studies concluded that there is a positive<br />

relationship between exports and economic growth.<br />

There are cross-country studies <strong>in</strong> the literature, <strong>of</strong> which key contributions are: Michaely<br />

(1977), Feder (1983), Ram (1985), Sheehey (1990), Lopez (1991) and Edwards (1992). These<br />

studies were aimed to see the role <strong>of</strong> exports for develop<strong>in</strong>g countries and argued <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong><br />

trade openness. Yet, there are some doubts concern<strong>in</strong>g the importance <strong>of</strong> trade openness and<br />

economic growth. Sheehey (1992) analyzed 53 non-oil develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, and found that<br />

the positive impact <strong>of</strong> exports is only important for the <strong>in</strong>dustrialized economies. However,<br />

Gunter et al. (2005) concluded that any ga<strong>in</strong>s from trade are <strong>of</strong>ten associated with external<br />

effects that are dynamic <strong>in</strong> nature.<br />

COPY RIGHT © 2011 Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Interdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>Research</strong> 447

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!