22.11.2012 Views

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ijcrb.webs.com<br />

INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS<br />

Content and face validity were established by a panel <strong>of</strong> human resources and statistical<br />

experts. A pilot test was conducted with 45 employees not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the sample.<br />

Questionnaire reliability was estimated by calculat<strong>in</strong>g Cronbach‘s alpha. Reliability for<br />

the overall <strong>in</strong>strument is placed under Appendix - A.<br />

4. Results<br />

Respondents consisted <strong>of</strong> 71.1% male and 25.9% female employees. The age <strong>of</strong> 47%<br />

respondents was between 25-35 years and 21% respondents were below 25 years. Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the employees (66.4%) had atta<strong>in</strong>ed a master degree. Almost 44.9% <strong>of</strong> the respondents<br />

were from middle management, 23.2% supervisory level, 26.9% non-managerial and<br />

4.9% top management. Number <strong>of</strong> years <strong>in</strong> present organization was from 3-5 years <strong>of</strong><br />

32.9% and 1-2 years <strong>of</strong> 26.1%. The majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents (64.6%) are permanently<br />

employed. The contractual employees comprise (31%) respondents. Almost 47.5% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respondents were from managerial / Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative category and 28.7% from technical<br />

category. Majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents (67.6%) were directly recruited whereas 28.2%<br />

respondents were promoted.<br />

Based on a five po<strong>in</strong>t Likert type scale with responses rang<strong>in</strong>g from strongly disagree (1)<br />

to strongly agree (5), the overall level <strong>of</strong> job satisfaction was 3.71 (SD = 0.57). In terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> Table 1 the results <strong>in</strong>dicate that there is a slight mean difference <strong>in</strong> the levels <strong>of</strong> job<br />

satisfaction with job performance (Mean = 3.68, SD = 0.65) and job satisfaction with job<br />

retention (Mean = 3.16, SD = 0.60).<br />

Variables<br />

Table: 1. Descriptive Statistics <strong>of</strong> all Variables<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation<br />

Job Performance 1.00 5.00 3.68 0.65<br />

Job Satisfaction 2.17 5.00 3.71 0.57<br />

Job Retention 1.67 4.83 3.16 0.60<br />

Valid N 568 568 568 568<br />

Correlation coefficients were calculated to describe the relationships between job<br />

satisfaction and job performance, job retention and job performance, job satisfaction and<br />

job retention (Table 2). Correlation coefficients were as follows: Job satisfaction, r =<br />

0.52; Job Retention, r = 0.23; and Job satisfaction-Job Retention, r = 0.34. Relations<br />

between job satisfaction and job performance were found highly significant whereas<br />

other relations were found significant also.<br />

Table: 2. Relationships between Job Performance (JP), Job satisfaction (JS) and Job<br />

Retention (JR)<br />

VARIABLES JP JS JR<br />

Job Performance ( JP )<br />

COPY RIGHT © 2011 Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Interdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>Research</strong> 172<br />

JANUARY 2011<br />

VOL 2, NO 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!