22.11.2012 Views

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in ... - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ijcrb.webs.com<br />

INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> a team to create the results its members truly desire‖ (Senge, 2006, p. 218).<br />

Fourth, shared vision provides the focus and energy for learn<strong>in</strong>g, and foster risk tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and experimentation, and people strive for a common aspiration when they truly share a<br />

vision (Senge, 2006). Fifth, systems th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g is the discipl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g the holistic view<br />

and enables to see relationships rather than th<strong>in</strong>gs and help see patterns <strong>of</strong> change rather<br />

than static ―snapshots‖. Moreover, this is an ensemble <strong>of</strong> all other four discipl<strong>in</strong>es fus<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them <strong>in</strong>to a coherent body <strong>of</strong> theory and practice. Senge‘s (2006) view about the leader <strong>of</strong><br />

a learn<strong>in</strong>g organization is different from the traditional view <strong>of</strong> leaders which is based on<br />

people‘s powerlessness, their lack <strong>of</strong> personal vision and <strong>in</strong>ability to master the forces <strong>of</strong><br />

change, deficits which can be remedied only by a few great leaders. Leader <strong>of</strong> a learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

organization is a special person who sets the direction, makes key decisions and energizes<br />

the <strong>in</strong>dividuals, and is a designer, a stewards, and a teacher.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Parek (2003) organizational learn<strong>in</strong>g is def<strong>in</strong>ed as ―the process by<br />

which an organization acquires, reta<strong>in</strong>s, and uses <strong>in</strong>puts for its development, and the<br />

process results <strong>in</strong> an enhanced capacity for cont<strong>in</strong>ued self-learn<strong>in</strong>g and self-renewal‖ (p.<br />

657). He suggested eight components that are necessary for organizational learn<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

occur. First, tak<strong>in</strong>g a systemic view (holistic frame) <strong>of</strong> organizational issues and enables<br />

members to see beyond the immediate and present, and br<strong>in</strong>gs root causes to the surface<br />

<strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g simply on symptoms. Second, strategic th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g views the strategic<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> each activity on an organization and enables managers to th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>of</strong><br />

consequences and implication <strong>of</strong> those actions. Third, a shared vision must be developed<br />

by the top management and be communicated throughout the organization. Fourth is the<br />

empowerment. In a learn<strong>in</strong>g organization people should be given appropriate authority,<br />

direction, and support to accomplish their task. Fifth, there must be a free flow <strong>of</strong> critical<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation at all levels, and even the negative <strong>in</strong>formation should be passed on<br />

will<strong>in</strong>gly. Sixth is Emotional Maturity that <strong>in</strong>cludes optimism, self-discipl<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

commitment, and moderate risk tak<strong>in</strong>g. Seventh is ‗Learn<strong>in</strong>g‘ that deals with creat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

conducive climate for learn<strong>in</strong>g that encourages dialogue and discussion. Selfdevelopment<br />

is valued. Eighth is Synergy which emphasizes collaboration and team work<br />

where people suspend their assumptions and th<strong>in</strong>k together. Cross-functional teams are<br />

used, and people generally like coord<strong>in</strong>ated action.<br />

Lei et al. (1999) suggested seven areas that foster learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> organizations:<br />

organizational design, organizational structure, decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g processes, crossfunctional<br />

teams, reward systems, management development, and corporate culture.<br />

First, organizational Design facilitate the knowledge diffusion and open communication<br />

throughout the organization. Second, Organizational structure changes because <strong>of</strong><br />

competencies and learn<strong>in</strong>g occurred. Senior management decides about the<br />

organizational structure. Open communication and knowledge shar<strong>in</strong>g is more fast and<br />

easier <strong>in</strong> the smaller divisions. Third, Decision mak<strong>in</strong>g processes are important element<br />

which help to balance the three knowledge drivers; <strong>in</strong>novation, <strong>in</strong>itiative, and competence<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g and help manager to coord<strong>in</strong>ate activities with strategies and allocate resources<br />

more appropriately on the basis <strong>of</strong> the clear understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the decision mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

process. Fourth, cross-functional teams collect the knowledge from different areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organization and facilitate the cross-functional learn<strong>in</strong>g. Fifth, reward systems should<br />

base on non-quantitative criteria to evaluate managers and promote learn<strong>in</strong>g and risktak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

behavior that is partly based on the <strong>in</strong>ter-division cooperation, develop<strong>in</strong>g the key<br />

COPY RIGHT © 2011 Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Interdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>Research</strong> 261<br />

JANUARY 2011<br />

VOL 2, NO 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!