12.07.2015 Views

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

214 Travaux préparatoires: United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized CrimeRolling text (A/AC.254/4/Rev.6)“Article 17 bis“Obstruction <strong>of</strong> justice“Each State Party shall adopt such legislative and other measures as may be necessaryto establish as criminal <strong>of</strong>fences the following conduct, when committed intentionally[and involving an organized criminal group]:“(a) The use <strong>of</strong> physical force, threats, intimidation or the promise, <strong>of</strong>fering orgiving <strong>of</strong> an undue advantage 2 to induce false testimony or to interfere in the giving<strong>of</strong> testimony or production <strong>of</strong> evidence in a proceeding in relation to the commission<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences covered by <strong>this</strong> Convention;“(b) The use <strong>of</strong> physical force, threats or intimidation to interfere with the exercise<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial duties by a justice or law enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficial in a proceeding in relationto the commission <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences covered by <strong>this</strong> Convention. Nothing in <strong>this</strong>subparagraph shall prejudice the right <strong>of</strong> States Parties to have legislation that protectsother categories <strong>of</strong> public <strong>of</strong>ficials.” 3, 4Seventh session: 17-28 January 2000Rolling text (A/AC.254/4/Rev.7)“Article 17 bis 5“Criminalization <strong>of</strong> obstruction <strong>of</strong> justice“Each State Party shall adopt such legislative and other measures as may be necessaryto establish as criminal <strong>of</strong>fences the following conduct, when committed intentionally[and involving an organized criminal group]:“(a) The use <strong>of</strong> physical force, threats, intimidation or the promise, <strong>of</strong>fering orgiving <strong>of</strong> an undue advantage to induce false testimony or to interfere in the giving<strong>of</strong> testimony or the production <strong>of</strong> evidence in a proceeding in relation to the commission<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences covered by <strong>this</strong> Convention;“(b) The use <strong>of</strong> physical force, threats or intimidation to interfere with the exercise<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial duties by a justice or law enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficial in relation to the commission<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences covered by <strong>this</strong> Convention. Nothing in <strong>this</strong> subparagraph shallprejudice the right <strong>of</strong> States Parties to have legislation that protects other categories<strong>of</strong> public <strong>of</strong>ficials.”2The formulation is intended to bring article 17 bis in line with article 4 ter.3At the sixth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, there were doubts as to whether it would be appropriate to establishan obligation to criminalize the attempt to commit the conduct described in subparagraphs (a) and (b). Some delegationspointed out that <strong>this</strong> would create difficulties at least with respect to subparagraph (b).4Germany proposed a new wording for article 17 bis to establish as a criminal <strong>of</strong>fence “suborning or attempting tosuborn another person to give false (sworn or unsworn) testimony”. Germany also expressed doubts as to whether subparagraph(b) was really necessary since the behaviour foreseen in that subparagraph was probably an <strong>of</strong>fence in any countryand therefore proposed that the provision should be deleted (A/AC.254/L.124).5The text <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> article was provisionally approved during the informal consultations held during the seventh session<strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee and recommended by the Chairmen <strong>of</strong> the informal consultations as the basis for the considerationand approval <strong>of</strong> the article by the Ad Hoc Committee at its eighth session.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!