12.07.2015 Views

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

472 Travaux préparatoires: United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crimetunity, including through the provision <strong>of</strong> adequate information, to make a claim for asylumor to present any other justification for remaining in the country, and that such claimswere considered on a case-by-case basis (see A/AC.254/27 and Corr.1, para. 18).2. The <strong>version</strong> <strong>of</strong> article 5 contained in <strong>document</strong> A/AC.254/4/Add.1/Rev.1 remainedunchanged in the intermediate drafts <strong>of</strong> the protocol (A/AC.254/4/Add.1/Revs.2-4).Rolling text (A/AC.254/4/Add.1/Rev.5)Eighth session: 21 February-3 March 2000“Article 5“Scope <strong>of</strong> application“[Except as otherwise provided,] <strong>this</strong> Protocol applies to <strong>of</strong>fences establishedunder <strong>this</strong> Protocol [that involve] [that are committed by] 4 an organized criminal groupas defined in the Convention. 5, 6Notes by the Secretariat3. After the finalization and approval <strong>of</strong> the text <strong>of</strong> the transnational organized crimeconvention at its tenth session, at its eleventh session the Ad Hoc Committee considered,finalized and approved article 5 <strong>of</strong> the migrants protocol, as amended (a) on the basis <strong>of</strong>a proposal submitted by Azerbaijan (see A/AC.254/5/Add.38) and (b) with the inclusion<strong>of</strong> a specific reference to “the protection <strong>of</strong> the rights <strong>of</strong> persons who have been the object<strong>of</strong> such <strong>of</strong>fences” to ensure consistency with the content <strong>of</strong> article 3 (finally article 2) <strong>of</strong>the protocol (Statement <strong>of</strong> purpose). The general agreement was to adopt mutatis mutandisthe approach adopted in the corresponding article 4 <strong>of</strong> the trafficking in persons protocol.The last amendments are reflected in the final text <strong>of</strong> the protocol, as included inthe report <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee (A/55/383, sect. IV, draft resolution, annex III), thatwas submitted to the General Assembly for adoption pursuant to resolution 54/126 <strong>of</strong> 17December 1999.4The major outstanding issue with respect to the application <strong>of</strong> the protocol remained the question <strong>of</strong> whether it wouldapply only to cases where an <strong>of</strong>fence had actually been committed by an “organized criminal group” or also to cases wherethere was some less direct involvement. The Chairman pointed out that it would be necessary to resolve that issue at thenext session and asked delegations to take the matter up with their Governments in the interim. A majority <strong>of</strong> delegationsthat spoke on <strong>this</strong> point supported the words “that involve”. In their view, the protocol should have a relatively broad application.Many pointed out that when States parties sought to apply the protocol in specific cases, they would be seekingassistance with an ongoing investigation. At such times, it might not be known whether organized crime was involved orit might be impossible to meet any basic standard <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> as a prerequisite to obtaining assistance under the protocol. Thosewho preferred the words “when committed by” felt that the protocol should apply to a narrower range <strong>of</strong> cases. A largemajority <strong>of</strong> the delegations speaking on both sides <strong>of</strong> the issue pointed out that the same question arose in other articles, inparticular article 4, and indicated that, once the problem was resolved, the same rule and the same language should be usedin other articles to make them consistent.5The new text <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> paragraph was based on a compromise text submitted by Mexico and the United States at theeighth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee. The words “Except as otherwise provided” were proposed to allow some flexibilityto extend the application <strong>of</strong> the protocol further with respect to specific articles should <strong>this</strong> prove necessary. Somedelegations had concerns about <strong>this</strong> and it was decided to place the text in square brackets pending an assessment, as otherarticles were reviewed, as to whether it would actually be necessary. Germany noted that <strong>this</strong> provision might not be neededat all, if the nature <strong>of</strong> the required link to <strong>of</strong>fences committed by transnational organized criminal groups was clarifiedin articles 3 and 4.6Paragraph 2, which appeared in previous drafts, was deleted and replaced with a new article 15 bis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!