12.07.2015 Views

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

500 Travaux préparatoires: United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime“6. When there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a vessel is engaged inthe smuggling <strong>of</strong> migrants by sea and it is concluded in accordance with the internationallaw <strong>of</strong> the sea that the vessel is without nationality or has been assimilatedto a vessel without nationality, States Parties shall conduct an inspection <strong>of</strong> the vessel,as necessary. If the results <strong>of</strong> the inspection indicate that the vessel is engagedin the smuggling <strong>of</strong> migrants, States Parties shall take appropriate measures in accordancewith relevant domestic and international law.”Rolling text (A/AC.254/4/Add.1/Rev.4)“Article 7 bis“Measures against the smuggling <strong>of</strong> migrants by sea“1. A State Party that has reasonable grounds to suspect that a vessel exercisingfreedom <strong>of</strong> navigation in accordance with international law and flying the flag ordisplaying marks <strong>of</strong> registry <strong>of</strong> another State Party is engaged in the smuggling <strong>of</strong>migrants may so notify the flag State, request confirmation <strong>of</strong> registry and, if confirmed,request authorization from the flag State to take appropriate measures withregard to that vessel. The flag State may authorize the requesting State, inter alia:“(a) To board the vessel; 18“(b) To inspect the vessel; and“(c) If evidence is found that the vessel is engaged in the smuggling <strong>of</strong> migrants,to take appropriate action with respect to the vessel, persons and cargo 19 on board, as[expressly] 20 authorized by the flag State [in accordance with article 7 ter <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong>Protocol]; 21“2. A State Party that has taken any action in accordance with paragraph 1 <strong>of</strong><strong>this</strong> article shall promptly inform the flag State concerned <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> that action.“3. A State Party shall respond expeditiously to a request from another State Partyto determine whether a vessel that is claiming its registry or flying its flag is entitled todo so and to a request for authorization made pursuant to paragraph 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> article.“4. A flag State may, consistent with article 7, paragraph 1, <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> Protocol,subject its authorization to conditions to be agreed by it and the requesting State,including conditions relating to responsibility and the extent <strong>of</strong> effective measures tobe taken [, including the use <strong>of</strong> force]. 22 A State Party shall take no additional actions18At the sixth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, several delegations expressed concern about the exact meaning <strong>of</strong>the word “board” and its translation into other languages. At issue was the extent to which use <strong>of</strong> the term would authorizethe boarding <strong>of</strong> a vessel against the will <strong>of</strong> the person in charge <strong>of</strong> it. The word “board” appears in both the 1988Convention and the interim measures.19At the sixth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, several delegations expressed concern about the reference to “personsand cargo” in <strong>this</strong> context.20At the sixth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, several delegations proposed that the word “explicitly” or the word“expressly” should be added at <strong>this</strong> point for greater clarity. Other delegations expressed reservations about the possibleeffect on domestic law.21This was compromise text proposed by the Chairperson at the sixth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee in responseto the proposal <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> delegations that a cross reference to the safeguard provisions <strong>of</strong> article 7 ter, paragraph 3(a), should be added to <strong>this</strong> article.22At the sixth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, a number <strong>of</strong> delegations expressed concern that the reference to “theuse <strong>of</strong> force” in <strong>this</strong> provision might serve as an authorization or encouragement to use force. Those delegations wanted thereference deleted. Other delegations expressed the view that the actual effect was to limit the use <strong>of</strong> force, by ensuring that<strong>this</strong> could only occur where authorized by the State whose flag the ship was entitled to fly or in which it was registeredand wanted the phrase retained. Several possible alternative texts were considered, but none found sufficient consensus.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!