12.07.2015 Views

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

620 Travaux préparatoires: United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime“(ii) Undergo inward processing 74 or economically relevant processing; or“(iii) Change modalities <strong>of</strong> transport. 75“Option 2“do not enter the market or domestic consumption.]” 76Rolling text (A/AC.254/4/Add.2/Rev.6)Eleventh session: 2-28 October 2000“For the purposes <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> Protocol:“Article 2“Use <strong>of</strong> terms 77“(a) ‘Ammunition’ shall mean the complete round or its components, includingcartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets or projectiles, that are usedin a firearm, provided that those components are themselves subject to authorizationin the respective State Party;“(b) ‘Firearm’ shall mean: 78“(i) Any portable barrelled weapon that expels, is designed to expel or may bereadily converted to expel a shot, bullet or projectile by the action <strong>of</strong> an explosive,excluding antique firearms or their replicas. Antique firearms and their replicasshall be defined in accordance with domestic law. In no case, however, shallantique firearms include firearms manufactured after 1899; [and“(ii) Any [other weapon or destructive device such as] an explosive bomb,incendiary bomb or gas bomb, grenade, rocket, rocket launcher, missile, missilesystem or mine]; 79“(c) ‘Illicit manufacturing’ shall mean the manufacturing or assembly <strong>of</strong>firearms, their parts and components or ammunition:74The working group noted that “inward processing” was a technical term referring to customs clearance procedures.75The working group noted that the words “modalities <strong>of</strong> transport” referred to ships, aircraft, trucks, trains and so on.76The working group noted that some delegations felt that <strong>this</strong> language would create excessively broad obligationsfor domestic customs controls.77At the eleventh session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, article 2 was finalized, with the exception <strong>of</strong> subparagraphs (b)(ii), (c) (iii) and (d).78At the eleventh session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, subparagraph (b) (i) was finalized, with the following explanatorynote: “The word ‘portable’ in subparagraph (b) (i) was included on the understanding that the intended meaning wasto limit the definition <strong>of</strong> ‘firearm’ to firearms that could be moved or carried by one person without mechanical or otherassistance.” (See the interpretative note below under section C.)79At the eleventh session, an informal working group established to consider articles 2 and 5 <strong>of</strong> the draft protocol recommendedthe deletion <strong>of</strong> subparagraph (b) (ii) and the adoption <strong>of</strong> a modified <strong>version</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Norwegian proposal for article5, paragraph 1 (d), that would require States parties to criminalize importing, exporting or manufacturing portabledestructive devices without a licence or authorization (see A/AC.254/L.268). The group also proposed that the definition <strong>of</strong>the term “destructive devices” should be left to domestic law, with a note to be included in the travaux préparatoires describingsuch devices. The Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Iran proposed to delete all references to destructive devices, while encouragingStates parties to criminalize illicit trafficking in such devices or to apply other provisions <strong>of</strong> the protocol to them using otheragreements between interested States (see A/AC.254/L.273). On the final day <strong>of</strong> the eleventh session, the Chairman proposeda number <strong>of</strong> changes to address all <strong>of</strong> the major issues that remained unresolved (see A/AC.254/4/Add.2/Rev.6, annex).His proposals included the deletion from the draft protocol <strong>of</strong> all references to destructive devices.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!