12.07.2015 Views

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32 Travaux préparatoires: United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized CrimeB. Approved text adopted by the General Assembly(see resolution 55/25, annex I)Article 3Scope <strong>of</strong> application1. This Convention shall apply, except as otherwise stated herein, to theprevention, investigation and prosecution <strong>of</strong>:(a) The <strong>of</strong>fences established in accordance with articles 5, 6, 8 and 23 <strong>of</strong><strong>this</strong> Convention; and(b) Serious crime as defined in article 2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> Convention;where the <strong>of</strong>fence is transnational in nature and involves an organized criminalgroup.2. For the purpose <strong>of</strong> paragraph 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> article, an <strong>of</strong>fence is transnationalin nature if:(a) It is committed in more than one State;(b) It is committed in one State but a substantial part <strong>of</strong> its preparation,planning, direction or control takes place in another State;(c) It is committed in one State but involves an organized criminal groupthat engages in criminal activities in more than one State; or(d) It is committed in one State but has substantial effects in another State.C. Interpretative notesThe interpretative notes on article 3 <strong>of</strong> the convention approved by the AdHoc Committee and contained in its report on the work <strong>of</strong> its first to eleventhsessions (see A/55/383/Add.1, paras. 7 and 8) are as follows:(a) During the negotiations <strong>of</strong> the convention, the Ad Hoc Committee notedwith deep concern the growing links between transnational organized crime and terroristcrimes, taking into account the Charter <strong>of</strong> the United Nations and the relevantresolutions <strong>of</strong> the General Assembly. All States participating in the negotiationsexpressed their determination to deny safe havens to those who engaged in transnationalorganized crime by prosecuting their crimes wherever they occurred and bycooperating at the international level. The Ad Hoc Committee was also stronglyconvinced that the convention would constitute an effective tool and the necessarylegal framework for international cooperation in combating, inter alia, such criminalactivities as money-laundering, corruption, illicit trafficking in endangeredspecies <strong>of</strong> wild flora and fauna, <strong>of</strong>fences against cultural heritage, and the growinglinks between transnational organized crime and terrorist crimes. Finally, the AdHoc Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the Ad Hoc Committee established by theGeneral Assembly in its resolution 51/210 <strong>of</strong> 17 December 1996, which was thenbeginning its deliberations with a view to the development <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive conventionon international terrorism, pursuant to Assembly resolution 54/110 <strong>of</strong> 9December 1999, should take into consideration the provisions <strong>of</strong> the convention.Paragraph 2 (d)(b) The term “substantial effects” is intended to cover situations where an<strong>of</strong>fence has had a substantial consequential adverse effect on another State party,for example where the currency <strong>of</strong> one State party is counterfeited in another Stateparty and the organized criminal group has put the counterfeit currency into globalcirculation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!