12.07.2015 Views

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part Three. Article 3 465“(ii) That has been improperly issued 13 or obtained through misrepresentation,corruption, 14 duress or other unlawful manner; 15 or“(iii) That is being used by a person other than the rightful holder; 16“(f) ‘Vehicle’ shall mean any conveyance that may be used for transportationby land or air; and“(g) ‘Vessel’ shall mean every description <strong>of</strong> water craft, including non-displacementcraft and seaplanes, used or capable <strong>of</strong> being used as a means <strong>of</strong> transportationon water, except a warship, naval auxiliary or other vessel owned or operatedby a Government and used, for the time being, only on government non-commercialservice. 17“2. For the purposes <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> Protocol, each State Party shall consider the illegalentry into or illegal residence in the territory <strong>of</strong> any other State Party equal toillegal entry into or illegal residence in its own territory.” 18Notes by the Secretariat1. At the informal consultations held during the fifth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad HocCommittee, the discussion on subparagraph 1 (a) <strong>of</strong> article 2 focused on whether the words“illegal residence” and “pr<strong>of</strong>it” should be deleted or retained. If those words were deletedfrom the text, subparagraphs (c) and (d) <strong>of</strong> paragraph 1 would also be deleted. Some delegationssuggested that the element <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it should be transferred to article 4, paragraph 5,relating to aggravating circumstances. One delegation also suggested adding the phrase “orany other procedure for an illegal stay in violation <strong>of</strong> the national law <strong>of</strong> a State Party” atthe end <strong>of</strong> subparagraph 1 (a). With regard to subparagraph 1 (b), there were three positionsconcerning the words “illegal entry”. Mexico suggested replacing the words “illegalentry” with the words “irregular or non-<strong>document</strong>ed entry”. The United States suggestedreplacing the word “illegal” with the word “irregular”, while other delegations expressedtheir concern that the word “irregular” did not cover all forms <strong>of</strong> “illegal” conduct. Thediscussion on subparagraphs 1 (e) and (g) was postponed. However, regarding subparagraph1 (e) in particular, one delegation suggested either its deletion or moving it to article 4(criminalization), while other delegations were in favour <strong>of</strong> retaining it. There was a convergence<strong>of</strong> views regarding subparagraph 1 (f); however, some delegations expressed concernabout the exact meaning <strong>of</strong> the term “vehicle”. Another delegation suggested that theword “aircraft” should be defined separately. With regard to paragraph 2, several delegationsproposed discussing the paragraph later, when article 4, on criminalization, and article 6,on jurisdiction, would be discussed or to move the paragraph to those articles.13At the fourth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, one delegation suggested that the word “altered” should be insertedafter the word “issued” (see, for example, the proposal submitted by Lithuania, contained in <strong>document</strong> A/AC.254/L.55).14At the fourth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, some delegations suggested deletion <strong>of</strong> the word “corruption”.15At the fourth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, one delegation suggested deletion <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> subparagraph.16At the fourth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, some delegations suggested deletion <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> subparagraph, whileanother delegation recommended moving it to article 4.17The source <strong>of</strong> the definition <strong>of</strong> “vessel” was the definition <strong>of</strong> “ship” contained in paragraph 2 <strong>of</strong> the interim measuresfor combating unsafe practices associated with the trafficking or transport <strong>of</strong> migrants by sea, approved in December1998 by the Maritime Safety Committee <strong>of</strong> the <strong>International</strong> Maritime Organization (MSC/Circ.896, annex, and also reproducedin <strong>document</strong> A/AC.254/CRP.3). At the fourth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, several delegations suggested that,for the wording <strong>of</strong> the interim measures, the United Nations Convention on the <strong>La</strong>w <strong>of</strong> the Sea (United Nations, TreatySeries, vol. 1954, No. 33480) should be applied. It was also suggested that the words “naval auxiliary or other vessel ownedor operated by a Government and used, for the time being, only on government non-commercial service” should be replacedwith the words “or any other government ship”.18At the fourth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, one delegation suggested that <strong>this</strong> subparagraph should be eitherdeleted or moved to the chapter on jurisdiction or criminalization.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!